Sorry mates, have a business exam tomorrow and I'd rank it more important than this debate but I will state some things. I do agree that not all muslims are bad people, in fact, muslim women and children are the main sufferers of the migrant crisis, however, it is still at the hand of muslim men who don't know any better because they hail from war-torn countries governed by the followings of Islam.
1) You don't have to perpetrate radical acts to have radical thoughts. How many imams are centred around the exploitation of the multicultural agenda to benefit the Islamist faith? How many imams preach the destruction of the West?
My point is illustrated throughout this whole video but watch from 3:50 to understand what I'm getting at. Don't tell me that every single person seen at the segment starting at 3:50 is a extremist and a terrorist?
Yes, muslim shootings are in the minority of the shootings that happen in America, and yes, they are propagated by pragmatic radicalised muslims but that doesn't mean that their agenda is to be cast into the umbrella of all the other shootings that have occured. Homophobia was in play, 11 muslim countries still execute homosexuals, this guy chanted 'Allahu Ackbar' during the attack. Each shooting is an individual case that needs to be treated as such, what happened? Why'd it happen? Motive?
Also, as a Libertarian, banning guns is stupid and I'll place an excerpt as to why:
'Gun control advocates are much like the prohibitionists of the early 20th Century. By making liquor illegal, they spawned organized crime, caused bloody, violent turf wars and corrupted the criminal justice system. Today's war on drugs has exactly the same results.
Prohibition didn't stop liquor use; the drug laws can't stop drug use. Making gun ownership illegal will not stop gun ownership.'
Also, there was a shooting in Bankstown not a couple weeks ago, so really, you got to ask yourself: Is it worth it? Do the pros outweigh the cons?
