i did 3 lolllll, don't think it mattersDid you guys do all 6 main challenges in megacities?
I only did 4 but evaluated in depth.... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
i did 3 lolllll, don't think it mattersDid you guys do all 6 main challenges in megacities?
I only did 4 but evaluated in depth.... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Noice.yeah same i did 4 in depth, sanitation/access to clean water, traffic congestion and infrastructure, housing challenges and lack of employment
ok goodi did 3 lolllll, don't think it matters
I can guarantee you all now that the gradient cannot be negative, despite whether or not you are going from a higher point to a lower point because in geography, order does not matter it's always the height of the highest point minus the height of the lower point. My teacher also told us to figure it out as run/rise as opposed to rise/run because then you get a whole number instead of a fraction (in this case i got 27.777 as the whole number) so then you just write it as 1:27.7777
yay exactly what i got...except i wrote the gradient as a fraction to get rid of the recurring decimal....is that bad?i got 100 for the vertical exagerattion and 27.7777 for the gradient
sounds like you're #winningPretty straight forward test. Im looking at 19/20 for mc going by what people are saying on here
i thought section 2 was really simple, straight from the syllabus and reckon i nailed it
i also had pre-prepared essays for essentially the same essay questions (25 & 26) + had them marked by my teacher who gave them 20/20 (she was a hsc marker is 2011)
over all feeling a high band 6, will be disappointed with any different
YES!!! I got this too. And im sure it isn't negative.gradient = rise/run
so it was like 1:27
I'm pretty sure it can't be negative lol