ESHAYS ADLAYS
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2006
- Messages
- 10
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2007
Ok, keep your faggit tendencies to yourself. You'd chain anything to a wall naked and gag it, wouldn't you sweetheart?transcendent said:
''Retards destroy everything"? Seems a tad politically incorrect... and be careful what you wish for, because maybe one day you'll rack up a few traffic infringements and find yourself in a cell with Mr. T, the samoan with a steaming erection.
Lets take a look at your argument though. You would chain every single one of these people up to a wall, naked, (blushing inwardly at your hard little knob), and allow them to be savagely beaten by the owners of the property they fucked up?
I hope you enjoy having your balls kicked, because I bet you've drawn on a school desk? Tossed a piece of rubbish on the ground? Spat? Had a party in a park? In some way you will have commited an offense which dirtied public property. I know I have, and regularly do. You have. Everyone has.
Graffiti, at its most pure, is not mindless vandalism. It is a highly stylised and original art from which has evolved from a desire to rebel against the oppressive and bleak social landscape which dominates our modern day society. It is the new revolution, and it represents the deepest desire of the human subconscious to show discontent with authority.
The way of the world, however, with its focus on commercialisation and the profit driven marketing teams fronting big companies, has exposed an underground artform, with a small group of dedicated followers, and integrated graffiti into popular culture. With the assimilation of anything into mainstream society comes, hand in hand, an explosion in the intake of participants in said activity. It happened with smoking, automobiles and, fuck me dead, with graffiti.
Now, it is generally accepted by society that advertising is an effective way of communicating information about almost any subject, and as such advertising is not illegal. Yet specific products may face a ban, such as tobacco, because they incite behaviour which is not socially desirable, and has a 'social cost', considered unacceptable by society. So, my brother, the conception and glorification of graffiti and the revolutionary ethos into mainstream society and its constant presence in advertising and commercial companies has led to it being a widely practised and followed artform. And yet the government does not ban graffiti in ads? And now you blame people for doing it? I could go on, and compare the relative incosequenciality of the act of graffiting a surface, owned by a restrictive, constrictive and often outright autocratical government to the relatively major act of murdering hundreds of thousands of innocent people overseas in wars that don't concern us, in countries you'll never visit, and in fact I could even study the relationship between the two acts, as cause and effect, government mistakes and individual discontent but fuck it. You get the point.
That is, if you even read this far... though from your rudimentary grasp of english I'm guessing you dropped out to clean toilets.
