The Coalition have been doing doubting the stimulus spending from the very beginning - why is it more important now that the Greens are doing it?
It's important because the Greens can actually decide to halt it if they want (balance of power), whereas the Liberals have been flailing against it in a most contrarian manner all along.
My answer would be that all the apologists are yet again jumping on the Greens bandwagon, maybe you'd like to correct me, though, Shodan.
That statement doesn't even make sense - it's just a collection a words forming hot air. From my perspective I would be trying to 'correct' your irrational dislike of the Greens, and I don't think I would achieve much. You're stuck in your ways, c'est la vie.
Preparing to be gang banged by someone who knows more about this than I do, but jeez, I just can't stand those Greens :angry:
The crux of it is that the Greens saw this stimulus as necessary, and still do, (whereas the Liberals couldn't fathom its purpose to begin with, like they can't fathom many things, such as compassion for refugees) but want a frank enquiry into whether or not it continues to be necessary now that the economy is clearly in better shape than predicted and compared to the rest of the world. Obviously if it's not necessary, there's no need to continue it.
The Greens are not tied down by Labour's need to continue the stimulus so as not to vindicate some camps of the Liberals.
As a final note, the Senate enquiry may well vindicate continued spending, as that's certainly what most economists and world leaders advocate right now, so don't get your hopes up for a Coalition 'triumph'.