MedVision ad

hard inequalities question (1 Viewer)

member 6003

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2022
Messages
83
Gender
Male
HSC
2023


I found this question in the JRHS 2023 paper that was upload here recently. I skipped it when I did the practise test, but when I went over it again I still couldn't get it. I asked my teacher and she hasn't gotten it as of yet. Could anyone help with this?

stuff you probably have to use:



I tried subbing in a-> (a^3+1)^(1/3) etc but didn't result in anything useful
i did some other manipulation and got this but I don't think it's useful either:


seems like using expanding LHS doesn't get anywhere useful since there is no way to get to the RHS.
 

member 6003

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2022
Messages
83
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
i'm pretty sure most/all of top 5 would've gotten it as my friend did but i don't have definite info
I guess I need to revise algebraic inequalities :( stuff like that is very hard to see if you haven't done something similar. I mean that was the only thing I couldn't do so its not that bad. Do you also have q11d) answer? My thing is probably right but the wording (of the question) is kinda weird.
 

kkk579

hello
Joined
Jul 24, 2021
Messages
1,652
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Female
HSC
2025


I found this question in the JRHS 2023 paper that was upload here recently. I skipped it when I did the practise test, but when I went over it again I still couldn't get it. I asked my teacher and she hasn't gotten it as of yet. Could anyone help with this?

stuff you probably have to use:



I tried subbing in a-> (a^3+1)^(1/3) etc but didn't result in anything useful
i did some other manipulation and got this but I don't think it's useful either:


seems like using expanding LHS doesn't get anywhere useful since there is no way to get to the RHS.
would this q be considered hard?
 

epicmaths

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2023
Messages
46
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Ugh I just had the misfortune of spending 3 hours on this to no avail.

This is harder than a lot of competition problems where Cauchy Schwartz, Jensen's, AM GM HM, bounding arguments etc feature more prominently.

After having had a look at the answers - I can say starting off applying GM\geq HM gives you slightly better chances at intuiting the correct terms to use in the denominator of the HM, but I would still personally have trouble seeing it.

For them to put this at Q14 out of 16 is madness.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top