Seventeenthofdecembe
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2016
- Messages
- 29
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2018
This might sound incredibly dumb to everyone who's been there, done that, but I'm having trouble phrasing the "EXPLAIN" and "ANALYSE" questions. Teachers at my old school never taught me the concepts listed on the BoS HSC terminology, so all I knew were to list facts lol. Now at this school, people take these terms a lot more seriously as they should, but I'm struggling over some of them >.<
<i>Explain: provide a why and how; cause and effect</i>
Explain under what circumstances a law would be considered just.
Okay, I'm going by the characteristics of a just law: equality, widely held beliefs and values, known before enforcement. Starting off: "A law would be considered just under the circumstance of equality." Okay, so why?? "A law would be considered just under the circumstance of equality, which gives citizens the right to a just law despite their race, nationality, sex, wealth and power." Now... how? "A law would be considered just under the circumstance of equality, which gives citizens the right to a just law despite their race, nationality, sex and wealth. This is enforced through various acts such as the Sex Discrimination Act of 1984 to protect the equality rights of all citizens."
Does that sound about right?
Now the analyse question. My downfall.
<i>Analyse: identify components and the relationship between them; draw out and relate implications.</i> (this definition has me confused already...)
Analyse the importance of laws being a reflection of society's values and ethics for which they are made.
Here I don't even know where to start. "Laws are an important reflection of society's values and ethics because (is that a good start? and now..)- *mindblank*
<i>Explain: provide a why and how; cause and effect</i>
Explain under what circumstances a law would be considered just.
Okay, I'm going by the characteristics of a just law: equality, widely held beliefs and values, known before enforcement. Starting off: "A law would be considered just under the circumstance of equality." Okay, so why?? "A law would be considered just under the circumstance of equality, which gives citizens the right to a just law despite their race, nationality, sex, wealth and power." Now... how? "A law would be considered just under the circumstance of equality, which gives citizens the right to a just law despite their race, nationality, sex and wealth. This is enforced through various acts such as the Sex Discrimination Act of 1984 to protect the equality rights of all citizens."
Does that sound about right?
Now the analyse question. My downfall.
<i>Analyse: identify components and the relationship between them; draw out and relate implications.</i> (this definition has me confused already...)
Analyse the importance of laws being a reflection of society's values and ethics for which they are made.
Here I don't even know where to start. "Laws are an important reflection of society's values and ethics because (is that a good start? and now..)- *mindblank*
Last edited: