• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Help, Random Q's on induction/binomial therom (1 Viewer)

Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
86
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Ok here are some questions from the textbook that i dont queit understand.

Find

a) The co-efficent of x^3 in the expansion of (x^2-2/x)^3

b) The term independent of x in the expansion of (2x+1/x)^10

c) The co-efficent of x in the expansion of (2x^2-x^-1)^11

Use mathematical induction to prove

a) 1+2+3+4+5......+n= n(n+1)/2

b) 1x2x3x4x5.......nx(n+1)= (1/3)n(n+1)(n+2)

c) (19^2n)-1 is a multiple of 360

Thanks, i dont really understand the binomal theory very well, i'm a little bit confused. But i understand pascals triangle well, i know the binomal theory is in realtion to this but i dont know how exactly. Could someone explain easily how this is so....

Thanks again
 

airie

airie <3 avatars :)
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
1,143
Location
in my nest :)
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
Preditor.89.N7G said:
Ok here are some questions from the textbook that i dont queit understand.

Find

a) The co-efficent of x^3 in the expansion of (x^2-2/x)^3

b) The term independent of x in the expansion of (2x+1/x)^10

c) The co-efficent of x in the expansion of (2x^2-x^-1)^11

Use mathematical induction to prove

a) 1+2+3+4+5......+n= n(n+1)/2

b) 1x2x3x4x5.......nx(n+1)= (1/3)n(n+1)(n+2)

c) (19^2n)-1 is a multiple of 360

Thanks, i dont really understand the binomal theory very well, i'm a little bit confused. But i understand pascals triangle well, i know the binomal theory is in realtion to this but i dont know how exactly. Could someone explain easily how this is so....

Thanks again
I'm not very good at combinatorics, but I'm gonna give it a shot anyway :p

a) To get x^3, you need to multiply two terms of x^2 with one term of -2/x, and when you multiply the three brackets (of x^2-2/x), there are 3C2=3 ways to get a term of x^3. And since x^2 * x^2 * (-2/x) gives x^3 with a coefficient of -2, the coefficent of x^3 in the expanded form will be -2*3 = -6.

b) Do this in a similar way to a). So to get a term independent of x, you need to multiple a term of 2x from one bracket to 1/x from another bracket, which gives 2. There are 10C2 ways to do this, so the final coefficient is 2*10C2.

c) Try this before you look :D
-2*(11 choose 2)

For the induction ones, I'll just do the inductive step, you can prove the base case and write that blurb afterwards :p

a) If 1+...+k = k(k+1)/2,
1+...+k+(k+1) = k(k+1)/2 + (k+1) = [k(k+1)+2(k+1)]/2 = (k+1)(k+2)/2.

b) Uhh, this is not right...Take 5 for example, 5! = 120 =/= 4*5*6/3, nor does it equal to 5*6*7/3.

c) If 360|192k-1,
192(k+1)-1 = 192*192k-1 = 192*(192k-1) + 192 -1,
And since 360|192k-1, 360|192*(192k-1),
also 192 -1 = 360, 360|360,
Therefore 360|192(k+1)-1.

As for the interpretation of binomial theorem, think of (a+b)^n as the multiplication of n brackets of (a+b), then look at the thinking above for those combinatorics questions. So when you need a term of akbn-k, you need to multiply terms of a, one each from k (out of the total n) brackets, to terms of b, one each from the remaining n-k brackets. Since there are nCk ways to choose which brackets to get the terms of a from (thus you get the terms of b from the remaining ones), and the coefficient of multiplying a's to b's is just 1 (so you get a term of akbn-k for each way of multiplication), the coefficient of the term akbn-k in the final expanded form is nCk.

Hopefully that made sense :D



EDIT: Oh, btw, if you want the connection to Pascal's triangle, see this:
n+1Ck+1 = nCk + nCk+1.

So if you know this, you can make sense of why kth number in nth row of Pascal's triangle is nCk, right? Then read what I wrote in the last paragraph above.

Now to prove n+1Ck+1 = nCk + nCk+1:

Consider that you've got n+1 items, from which you need to choose k+1 items. Label the last item as L, so you could either include L in your choice, or exclude it.

If you include it, you need to choose another k items from the remaining n items, thus there are nCk ways of choice;
If you exclude it, you need to choose k+1 items from the remaining n items, thus there are nCk+1 ways of choice.

As either of these two are possible, you add them, giving nCk + nCk+1. This is equivalent to choosing k+1 items from all n+1 items, therefore n+1Ck+1 = nCk + nCk+1.
 
Last edited:

airie

airie <3 avatars :)
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
1,143
Location
in my nest :)
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
Just a note, when I mentioned the kth number in the nth row of Pascal's triangle, I take the row that's notionally the 1st row (the one with a single 1) to be the 0th row, and the term that's notionally the 1st in each row (the first 1) to be the 0th term. This then allows representing Pascal's triangle more nicely.
 
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
86
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Thanks airie, ur a legend.

With that question b of mathematical induction, just exculde the 5 :). i think i did that by mistake.
 

airie

airie <3 avatars :)
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
1,143
Location
in my nest :)
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
You're welcome :)
Preditor.89.N7G said:
With that question b of mathematical induction, just exculde the 5 :). i think i did that by mistake.
...? So you mean...it only works for some values?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top