Bigboyjames lol
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2009
- Messages
- 256
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
no body cared back then and no body would have cared today if that dumb yank wasnt on the show. period.
That's another thing I have an issue with. When MJ was alive, it seemed it was perfectly okay to make fun of his looks, lifestyle, etc. But now that he's dead, it's become taboo? I'm not having a go at you, mirakon, just wondering why this is the case.Agreed. US citizens may find such a skit racist considering that the blackface actors had a surprising resemblance to the racist piccaninny dolls from several decades back. However, Australia has no such historical context, there was no such piccaninny phenomenon in Australia and any racist intentions as a result are highly improbable (it was probably a simple coincidence).
Admittedly though, I do think it was a bit slack to mock Michael Jackson after he's dead, but there still shouldn't be such a fuss.
Anyway, I heard this skit was performed several years ago already. Does anyone know what the reaction was back then?
It was all I saw and I was a bit surprised too - not so much for the racism, but for the fact that his death is still v recent. They probably wouldntve let a Steve Irwin impersonator on etc
lol m8 check your 200 word essay back at me to justify your racism to help you sleep at nightDo you even know what the word racist means? Racist is probably the most over-used word in the english language. There is a difference between blackface being offensive (which it is) and racist. It can only be racist if there is a racist intent which there wasn't. The historical context of blackface in the United States means that it is offensive and someone who dons blackface in the US may be delibrately provoking racial issues, but we don't have that same history in Australia. Nonetheless it may still be offensive for other reasons which doesn't make it any more acceptable, but just NOT racist. The backgrounds of the performers make it less likely that there was a racist intent as most racism stems from the insecurities of a majority.
Id rather be able to coherently write two hundred words than struggle with one sentence ^^lol m8 check your 200 word essay back at me to justify your racism to help you sleep at night
We only see it as being in bad taste because Harry Connick Jr had a whinge. If he wasn't on that panel we wouldn't have cared about it. But because he goes and acts like the defender of all things American we care.It was bad taste imo.
Read a great comment in The Age:
"What's all the fuss about? Didn't Michael Jackson impersonate a white man for half his life?"
IT IS racist.
Jackson 5 is not 'black face' they're brown.. why didn't they use brown paint on their face instead. The fact that they used black instead looked like a minstrel show.. even before Harry Connick Jr said anything I was like.. damn Americans going to piss on Australia for this (which they did, Bill O'Reilly, The View, Etc)
We're only good at making news around the world anything RACE related. Shame Australia.
They dance like retards, even the clip 20 years ago they made themselves look like monkeys...for fucks sake you dumb fucking woman
all you/america is doing is playing the race card - bringing racism into the picture where it isn't needed.
Lets take a look at the definition of racism:
The belief that one race is superior to all others; Prejudice or discrimination based upon race
Where in the skit did they try and show that black people were lesser? where?
Where in the skit was there predjudice or discrimination against black people? SO, they put black polish on their faces. What predjudice is that showing? what were they discriminating black people from? How would have putting brown shoe polish instead of black been any different.
Shut the fuck up now