Students helping students, join us in improving boredofstudies.org by donating and supporting future learners!
Again, that depends on whether or not captive conservation is actually of any real benefit.Dubbo is way better than Taronga for the animals, but both do really good conservation work
The idea is that captivity in zoos etc benefits the animal due to tourists funding the researchers ability to 'benefit the animal in some way.'I agree with captivity but only for the sake of breeding to get the numbers up...or for the public to learn more about the animal if it can benefit the animal in some way.
Unfortunately captive breeding tends to select for traits that encourage it, i.e. friendliness towards humans, easy temperament, etc, which aren't necessarily genetic traits necessary for life in the wild.The idea is that captivity in zoos etc benefits the animal due to tourists funding the researchers ability to 'benefit the animal in some way.'
Oh yes, places like Werribee are great, especially for intelligents like elephants and carnivores because they have enrichment and, more importantly, space. But those places are few and far inbetween purely because of the space required.I'd contrast metropolitan zoos to places like Werribee Open Range Zoo.
It depends wholly on the circumstances. If you can provide a safe, interesting and healthy environment that is big enough for the animal and potentially allows the species a better chance at survival overall, I don't think that's a bad thing.
Yeah but that's the point. Captive breeding programs inherently select for traits that make captivity, and therefore captive breeding, easier. These traits are often incompatible with those that are required for life in the wild. Getting the numbers up is useless unless you can release them into the wild (the whole point of captive breeding programs).What about those breeding programs to get the numbers up?
How?Captive breeding programs inherently select for traits that make captivity, and therefore captive breeding, easier.
Imagine a group of 4 people in a room. You wanted to breed the best child possible out of all of them. One of the people has cerebral palsy, one has severe diorrhoea, one is a guy in perfect physical health and one is a chick with blonde hair and blue eyes. Using this example, you segregate or annihilate the broken people and breed the healthy ones to make sure that the species has a better chance for survival.How?