Here's something I posted in our uni club's forum. I was asking students from the same school as I'm in but I think this would also apply to a lot of other uni students regardless of school and course.
---
As you may have noticed, UOW's SITACS courses are very flexible in a way that only a handful are core subjects and the rest are just left for students to fill. This is especially true if you're doing a Bachelor of Computer Science degree. IMHO it gives us a lot of freedom compared to some unis where up to 90% are compulsory. In my program of study, BCompSc 2003, only 36cps are compulsory, or 25% of the whole degree.
This can be seen as good or bad. The good part is that students can choose to specialise in a particular field or do the subjects they like most and avoid those that they dislike. On the other hand it may mean UOW is not producing graduates with consistent skills/capabilities, meaning grads who are either extremely weak or extremely strong in academics. Student A may fill his degree with the really challenging subjects while student B may choose the easiest subjects available each session. Yet, when employers start screening graduates more often than not they will only look at your average. Unfair, isn't it? Someone who might have done bludge subjects and got a D average might be considered over someone who have done maybe up to 300-level maths but with only a C average.
I'm slowly going off-topic here. What I wanted to ask was how you crafted your degree? Why did you choose those subjects?
Your thoughts please.