I'm not sure i understand. For example, if we get the same mark in 3U, but i don't do 4U and you do 4U, does that mean you rank higher than I do?They break the ties by taking in fact your 3U AND 4U mark.
That's how it works for math at least.
Nope. It's like this,I'm not sure i understand. For example, if we get the same mark in 3U, but i don't do 4U and you do 4U, does that mean you rank higher than I do?
thanks so muchFrom NESA:
“If students are equal on the highest HSC marks in a course, then the following process is used to determine the recipient(s):
1. take an average of each student's exam mark and assessment mark after alignment to performance bands, each to one decimal place
2. take an average of each student's exam mark and assessment mark before alignment to performance bands, each to two decimal places
3. if an extension course, use the marks awarded for other courses in the subject area.”
If candidates are still indistinguishable (probably most likely in the maths courses where many students achieve 100% raw), I’ve heard that working/reasoning and even handwriting have been compared to determine the state ranks. NESA has awarded equal firsts (especially in 2 unit and genny) so I’d assume that sometimes the subjective comparison fails to differentiate candidates.
thank you so mush i also have same question in my mindFrom NESA:
“If students are equal on the highest HSC marks in a course, then the following process is used to determine the recipient(s):
1. take an average of each student's exam mark and assessment mark after alignment to performance bands, each to one decimal place
2. take an average of each student's exam mark and assessment mark before alignment to performance bands, each to two decimal places
3. if an extension course, use the marks awarded for other courses in the subject area.”
If candidates are still indistinguishable (probably most likely in the maths courses where many students achieve 100% raw), I’ve heard that working/reasoning and even handwriting have been compared to determine the state ranks. NESA has awarded equal firsts (especially in 2 unit and genny) so I’d assume that sometimes the subjective comparison fails to differentiate candidates.
Not sure where you got that from but this is definitely not true. If you look that the actual state ranks in previous years you see plenty of examples where students from lower ranked schools were placed above or tied with those from higher ranked schoolsI think your school's performance (holistically) also matters? Like theres bound to be students with the same marks but your school's ranking will determine the higher rank for a specific student
Oh? Ok nvm I must be very wrongNot sure where you got that from but this is definitely not true. If you look that the actual state ranks in previous years you see plenty of examples where students from lower ranked schools were placed above or tied with those from higher ranked schools