If that is what they said, they yes they're serious about it - these are considered to be hurdle requirements. No matter how well you did elsewhere you need to satisfy the hurdle requirements.Shawny said:how serious are they about it?
for teh faculty of commerce and the school of accounting in particular?
babydoll_ said:And can somebody give me details about "Pass Conceded"
Here is UNSW's PC policy.Frigid said:nancy: a 'Pass Conceded' is when you fail, but only by a little bit (usually the range is between 45 - 49). then you undertake another supplementary exam (i think), and if you pass that, you get a 'Pass Conceded'. it is recorded as that in your academic transcript and it's not exactly a good mark to get. it's worth 3 grade points as far as your GPA goes.
In deciding whether a student is eligible for the award of a PC (Pass Conceded), Faculty Assessment Review Groups apply a standard concession algorithm. An undergraduate student will be considered for the award of a Pass Conceded on a mark returned by the course authority that falls between 46 and 49 inclusive, provided that any of the following conditions is met:
1. the mark is 48 or 49 and the student’s term WAM is at least 53;
2. the mark is 46 or 47 and the student’s term WAM is at least 55;
3. the student’s cumulative WAM prior to the start of the current session is at least 55; or
4. the student is a potential graduand with no failures in the current term. See Sub-section 3.2.22
5. However,
* a returned grade of UF cannot be converted into PC without reference to the course authority; and
* a student who has previously been awarded PCs for courses totalling 18 units of credit or more shall not normally be award
ed further PCs
I don't think its about "looking good". Marks should be scaled so that the mean is something reasonable to compensate for the difficulty of the assessments.Capulet said:for computing its pretty strict
im looking forward for the results for comp1b. the exam was structured so that its pretty difficult to get a pass... well i thought so. if half the course failed... would u think a normal lecturer would scale the marks abit so he/she doesnt look bad?
i thought that exam was actually pretty easyCapulet said:for computing its pretty strict
im looking forward for the results for comp1b. the exam was structured so that its pretty difficult to get a pass... well i thought so. if half the course failed... would u think a normal lecturer would scale the marks abit so he/she doesnt look bad?
Stupid buses. I actually drew a diagram about buses, from unsw to central and vice versa, labelling "895" and "891". Lower comp got an advantage :/tonberry_kun said:i thought that exam was actually pretty easy
i mean it was kinda tricky near the start with those questions that look easy, but actually trick ya
like that question with the FOR loop, in which the 4 lines under it were indented by there werent any "{/}" brackets
Hi Nancy. I actually have my lab demonstrator on my msn and I asked her about how this works for you and she told me that in our chem course, if you fail within 45-49 they (Dr. Duffy and Dr. Roberts) will firstly look at 3 things to determine if you deserve pass conceded:babydoll_ said:I dunno, because a couple of my friends were issued a PC last semester for chemistry. Last semester I passed by a good few marks but this semester for chemistry, my marks are pretty borderline... and I think I failed the final. Like Shawny I want to know about the 'fail if no pass' thing, because I was told that if we fail the final exam, we'll fail the course regardless of how well we did in the other components. The final for CHEM1021 is worth 60%.
Ah fuck.