MedVision ad

HSC 2014 MX2 Marathon ADVANCED (archive) (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

the inequality shows symmetry in a, b and c. nature does not favor one or the other.
minimum value when a=b=c=3/4
Wait is this an actual theorem? What is it called?
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

the inequality shows symmetry in a, b and c. nature does not favor one or the other.
minimum value when a=b=c=3/4
Symmetry in variables does not mean that minima occur when all variables are equal...
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

in this case when does minimum occur?
In this question it happens to occur when x,y and z are equal. But this isn't because of symmetry, this is because Davo has shown it above (the only steps where inequality was introduced was the applications of AM-GM, whose equality conditions we understand well.) Writing what you did is not valid because there is no reason (that you have provided) why such an expression HAS to be minimised at x=y=z.
 

jyu

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Messages
623
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

A triangle with side lengths a, b, c is inscribed in a circle of radius 1. Prove that a+b+c>=abc.
 

jyu

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Messages
623
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

In this question it happens to occur when x,y and z are equal. But this isn't because of symmetry, this is because Davo has shown it above (the only steps where inequality was introduced was the applications of AM-GM, whose equality conditions we understand well.) Writing what you did is not valid because there is no reason (that you have provided) why such an expression HAS to be minimised at x=y=z.
In this case the minimum 3/4 is given. The expression equals the min value when a=b=c, this is chosen due to symmetry, or should I say the cyclic nature of the expression. If a, b and c are different then the expression will be >= 3/4.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

In this case the minimum 3/4 is given. The expression equals the min value when a=b=c, this is chosen due to symmetry, or should I say the cyclic nature of the expression. If a, b and c are different then the expression will be >= 3/4.
Yes, it does equal 3/4 when a=b=c. But this does not prove that this is a minimum, and you cannot assume 3/4 is a minimum because that is what the question is asking you to prove.

Symmetry means that a=b=c is often a good candidate for a minimum, but doesn't prove anything without additional information.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Yes, it does equal 3/4 when a=b=c. But this does not prove that this is a minimum, and you cannot assume 3/4 is a minimum because that is what the question is asking you to prove.

Symmetry means that a=b=c is often a good candidate for a minimum, but doesn't prove anything without additional information.
Picture it this way in two variables x and y:

A real function f can be viewed as a graph z=f(x,y).

Saying such a function is symmetric, is just saying that it's graph has reflective symmetry about the plane x=y.

This just means that any extrema will have a "mirrored" extrema on the other side of this plane. It definitely does not imply that every extrema must lie on x=y.
 

jyu

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Messages
623
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Look at some easier examples to picture. Area of a rectangle of fixed perimeter = xy, symmetry in x and y; volume of a cuboid of fixed surface area = xyz, symmetry in x, y and z.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Look at some easier examples to picture. Area of a rectangle of fixed perimeter = xy, symmetry in x and y; volume of a cuboid of fixed surface area = xyz, symmetry in x, y and z.
So what if some symmetric expressions have extrema when all variables are equal? This does not mean that all do, so we can't use it in proofs.

Here is a symmetric expression in two variables, (switching x and y just switches the roles of the two bracketed terms).



But P only attains it's minimum of 0 at (1,-1) and (-1,1). When x=y, it is positive.

Why does your "rule" apply for the question Sy asked, but not for the expression in this post?
 
Last edited:

jyu

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Messages
623
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

So what if some symmetric expressions have extrema when all variables are equal? This does not mean that all do, so we can't use it in proofs.

Here is a symmetric expression in two variables, (switching x and y just switches the roles of the two bracketed terms).



But P only attains it's minimum of 0 at (1,-1) and (-1,1). When x=y, it is positive.

Why does your "rule" apply for the question Sy asked, but not for the expression in this post?
Because of the constants.
Change x+1 to X and y-1 to Y,
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

The constants? Which constants and what about them?

What is the purpose of this coordinate change? P is not symmetric in X and Y (and we should not expect it to be, because the relationship between (x,y) and (X,Y) breaks symmetry.

Your claim was:

Symmetry in variables => Any minimum must happen when all variables are equal.

I provided an example of an expression that is (A) symmetric, and (B) does not have a minimal point with x=y, but has a minimum elsewhere.

If you think this is not a counterexample to your claim then you must contest one of these two assertions. Which one, and why? Please be precise, as I am making an effort to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top