Re: HSC 2015 2U Marathon
Might be harder than last year, but I doubt too hard.Omfg....
Might be harder than last year, but I doubt too hard.Omfg....
that is still a bad omen hahaMight be harder than last year, but I doubt too hard.
Well it shouldn't be easier than last year because last year's 2U was on the easier side wasn't it?that is still a bad omen haha
nah, but 2u maths isn't too bad if you did your practice (it's mostly memorising methods and applying accordingly)
I just hope that it won't be as hard as the 2013 paperWell it shouldn't be easier than last year because last year's 2U was on the easier side wasn't it?
nek minut...I just hope that it won't be as hard as the 2013 paper
only trolling lmfaoWtf....
I hope so haha because I actually work harder in maths than eco lol. I was too complacent for eco and was fked up by it yesterdayonly trolling lmfao
but srsly, the paper shouldn't be too bad - provided that you studied diligently
Split it into two areas from x=0 to x=1 (point of intersection), and x=1 to x=2. The first part is the area under 4x-x2, while the second part is the area under 4-x2:How do I find the area of the shaded region?
I don't understand why you add them and use 1, instead of 2.Split it into two areas, one per function:
.
If you find , the area you are finding is
Its because the area under the graph are both equal to each other. You could use 2 but would you want to integrate with a negative domain ?I don't understand why you add them and use 1, instead of 2.
How do I find the area of the shaded region?
Oh I just got it! Thanks all.Its because the area under the graph are both equal to each other. You could use 2 but would you want to integrate with a negative domain ?
EDIT: you can use it doesnt matter
If you're using O, A, and (4,0) to make your triangle, it is not a triangle as a side would be curved - the one from A to (4,0).Why can't I use the area of the triangle under the line to minus from the area under the curve???
Say instead of doing f(parabola) - f(line), I do f(parabola) - 1/2ab (triangle area). But I get the wrong answer doing the latter.
I meant like this:If you're using O, A, and (4,0) to make your triangle, it is not a triangle as a side would be curved - the one from A to (4,0).
It will work (but the bounds are 0 to 3 or else it'll give a negative for the integral)I meant like this:
Using integration, from 3 to 0, f(parabola) - area of triangle. Shouldn't this work?
These two methods are actually exactly the same. Integrating that line over the right bounds just gives us that triangle's area. If you're getting a wrong answer doing the latter, you might have made a silly mistake somewhere.Oh I just got it! Thanks all.
Another question tho:
Say instead of doing f(parabola) - f(line), I do f(parabola) - 1/2ab (triangle area).
you're making it too complicated with the triangle, there is no need..I meant like this:
Using integration, from 3 to 0, f(parabola) - area of triangle. Shouldn't this work?