I think my method was an induction, but might have involved contradiction in proving one of the steps.Hi seanieg89. I can get some sort of induction argument going, but was wondering if there is a proof by contradiction. It seems just right for one!?
sorry but can you explain what the question is asking for? I don't know what that last symbol is supposed to mean.
Assuming that the symbol means "for x between and including 0, and 1", I get an integer answer. Is it an integer answer? I'd like post my solution, but only if I'm sure that there's no sillies.
I think this question is beyond the Ext2 course (the whole idea of convex sets and the intersections of such sets).
Do you understand the definition of a convex set in the first sentence?sorry but can you explain what the question is asking for? I don't know what that last symbol is supposed to mean.
This is only necessarily true if:
Let
Okay, so let be the claim for a given positive integer .
Can you post a problem which you found to be quite tough from when you were year 12?Suppose were not true.
Then given such convex sets , we could find distinct points in the plane such that is only in the three sets that AREN'T .
But any four points in the plane define a unique convex quadrilateral Q.
Without loss of generality suppose this quadrilateral has vertices in anti-clockwise order.
Then by convexity, the diagonal lies in and the diagonal lies in .
As the diagonals of a convex quadrilateral intersect, that means the point of intersection of these diagonals must lie in every .
This completes the proof of , and hence the whole problem.
I can't really remember off the top of my head. Try some of the problems from olympiads.Can you post a problem which you found to be quite tough from when you were year 12?
Prove that (n+1)^(n+1) + (-n)^n is not divisble by 9 for any natural number n.
How can we have the example of ? Didn't you say needed to be integer?Define a function by:
Where is prime, is a positive integer, and is the highest power of that divides .
Note that doesn't have to be integer. i.e.
You are given that the function defined has t
he property that:
Use this function to prove that the square root of all non-square positive integers is irrational.