Your example is that of a competent, effective government that presided over 16 years of economic growth which included two international financial crisis, that reduced gross debt 7%, that eliminated over a hundred rorter loopholes in tort legislation, that was largely credited for eliminating corruption within the NSW police force and made the biggest investment in road transport in the states history, which was voted out by a record margin in 2011 because of indiscretions of such insignificance they wouldn't have even warranted an enquiry in most member states of the EU. Your thesis is that this proves democracy does not safeguard against corruption?
@Mrs Thatcher
I live in Sydney; and lets analyse this.
16 years of economic growth is hardly related to a state government, but lets look at some of their implemented policies.
40% of total in management tax for people who are disabled and claim the state as their ward. (So 40% of the money from insurance companies given to people who suffered from accidents would end up in the state purse, if the injured did not claim the state as their ward the insurance company would proceed to sue [I know a few people who went through that mess])
If they eliminated corruption in the police force why were there two charges of corruption amongst the police not a month ago?
For all the investment in road transport it now takes me longer to get to school that it used to; none of the major upgrades occured in Liberal held seats.
Then there are the tennancy laws which reduced private property to the level of public housing in the eyes of the courts.
I dont see how at least 1,000,000,000 dollars going missing is an insignificant indiscretion.
And Im not even going to comment on the bureaucratic mess that the EU thrives in.
Have a look at it; it elects its own seats to create and implement its own policies what sort of a democracy are you calling that?