Damage Inc. said:
Aboriginals aren't real Australians, cocksalad, they migrated to Australia too.
mmmmmmmm be careful when you say that.
yes, i agree that many tribes of nomadic people migrated to a landmass, known to us since 1901 as 'australia'. but realise that the 'nation' of australia wasn't formally established as a whole political or constitutional entity, when you take the western view. the aboriginal people had their own tribes (over 300+ from memory) which had very slightly different customs and traditions.
but what i would like to point out is that, are they the FIRST people to immigrate here? was the land uninhabited then by homo sapiens? was the land THEN, (claiming to be more than 40,000 yrs ago) deemed to be called 'terra nullius'? if so, then i suppose we can classify the aboriginal people as the 'first australians' and i use that term in its broadest sense.
now, some people raised the fact that the british had a legitimate claim to the land 'australia' because it was terra nullius, and based their claim of soverigenity over the land was uncultivated and desert. this claim, as seen in the viewpoint of today's PC, and seen by the Mabo decision by the High Court of Australia, was not legitimate. just clearing up some facts here.
anyhow, we can't really change history. but i guess, we can attempt to amend the atrocities done in history.