Does anypne know how to propperly refference the case ?
Would it be
Re Woolley and Another; Ex parte APPLICANTS m276/2003 (by their next friend GS)(2004) 210 ALR 369
Its so annoying im totally clueless about the case...
Let alone what obiter dictum and ratio of it is ? Anyone know ? Any ideas would be appreciated....
Also is the father also a party to the case or just the children, manager and minister?
thX heaps in advance to anyone who replies....
shoulda done interior design.. :s
Would it be
Re Woolley and Another; Ex parte APPLICANTS m276/2003 (by their next friend GS)(2004) 210 ALR 369
Its so annoying im totally clueless about the case...
Let alone what obiter dictum and ratio of it is ? Anyone know ? Any ideas would be appreciated....
Also is the father also a party to the case or just the children, manager and minister?
thX heaps in advance to anyone who replies....
shoulda done interior design.. :s