Much better than Heinemann, I found the layout of Jacaranda is much easier to read. And they have more information too.Yaz88 said:beter den heinemaann
good work, sounds like a good mark for IPT. my teacher gives me photocopies from jacaranda, so i shouldn't find it hard to summarise.disco_dave said:i found heinmann fine (got 94 in the IPT HSC exam, with minimal teacher help!). I think he is a senior HSC marker or setter isnt he??
Followed the syllabus fine, although i didnt use a jacca so i cant down them. But in PDH jacca text book did seem to waffle alot (bit like me).
dont think the good mark in IPT helps much. It has to be a fair way above you other marks to actually count for you UAI (not weighted very hard<< which i totally disagree with). So much textbook work and very little practical... although i didnt find the theory that hard. But not easy.Huratio said:good work, sounds like a good mark for IPT. my teacher gives me photocopies from jacaranda, so i shouldn't find it hard to summarise.
i dont do economics!!!disco_dave said:dont think the good mark in IPT helps much. It has to be a fair way above you other marks to actually count for you UAI (not weighted very hard<< which i totally disagree with). So much textbook work and very little practical... although i didnt find the theory that hard. But not easy.
Do well in economics!
but if you can regurgitate hienmann with his "technical" writing style, the examiners will love it.sparkl3z said:i agree dat jacaranda is better, hienmann was used at my skool but its really borring, its got all this exaggeration and technical stuff, it makes it difficult to undastand something that is so simple