Okay, i'm being completely serious when asking this...
So as you may know, Sam Davis wrote a book on the SDD HSC Course... and a few unfortunate schools (mine included) have been forced to use it as the textbook for the HSC
This [Offensive term referring to author removed] WROTE 370 PAGES WORTH OF INFORMATION!!!!!!!
Seriously, for one section (Sorry, cant remember the name of it... it may have been parity checks) I decided to compare Davis book to Heinemann and Jacranda...
For this section, Jacaranda wrote about 3 quarters of a page, Heinemann wrote half. Sam Davis wrote 9 PAGES on this section alone, 3 pages of which was a HSC question... so 6 pages worth of crap on this section!!!!
Do teachers not see this when buying us this book? Is Sam Davis a retard for thinking we need this much information?
There is no F'n point memorising 6 pages worth of notes when there is half a page PERFECTLY explaining the concept. Davis does this for 370+ pages!!!!!
/// end rant!
[Moderator Note: I have edited this post to remove an offensive term used to disparage the author of the book. For the same reason, I have changed the title of the thread to ask if the author is incompetent. It is fine to express negative views on a textbook but I ask everyone to remember to choose appropriate language. Thank you.]
So as you may know, Sam Davis wrote a book on the SDD HSC Course... and a few unfortunate schools (mine included) have been forced to use it as the textbook for the HSC
This [Offensive term referring to author removed] WROTE 370 PAGES WORTH OF INFORMATION!!!!!!!
Seriously, for one section (Sorry, cant remember the name of it... it may have been parity checks) I decided to compare Davis book to Heinemann and Jacranda...
For this section, Jacaranda wrote about 3 quarters of a page, Heinemann wrote half. Sam Davis wrote 9 PAGES on this section alone, 3 pages of which was a HSC question... so 6 pages worth of crap on this section!!!!
Do teachers not see this when buying us this book? Is Sam Davis a retard for thinking we need this much information?
There is no F'n point memorising 6 pages worth of notes when there is half a page PERFECTLY explaining the concept. Davis does this for 370+ pages!!!!!
/// end rant!
[Moderator Note: I have edited this post to remove an offensive term used to disparage the author of the book. For the same reason, I have changed the title of the thread to ask if the author is incompetent. It is fine to express negative views on a textbook but I ask everyone to remember to choose appropriate language. Thank you.]
Last edited by a moderator: