lyounamu said:
Please, don't be prejudiced without fully knowing about it. kaz1 is right. Qur'an does not condone violence, it is just that some Muslims interpret it wrong and they carry out terrorist attacks from that wrong interpretation.
Actually, the Quran does arbitrarily condone violence many times. Similarly, the context it was produced in and was used to compliment was one of violence. Just follow the life of its apparent author, Muhammad, especially after the 622 Hijra to Medina.
Remember the Nakhla raids? Remember the poor Quraysh killed by Muhammad? Remember when he sent Abdullah bin Jahsh to kill a tribe of Quraysh and rob them?
OH! What about the Battle of Badr? Then the declaration of war against the Arab Pagans? Or when he laid siege against the Qaynuqa?
Remember when he contracted young Muhammad Bin Maslama to assassinate the poet Ka'b bin l-Ashraf? Remember how straight after that he said "Kill the Jew that falls into your power" and his followers started murdering innocent people such as the merchant Ibn Sunayna?
And let us not forget Muhammad's assassination contract out on Sufyan ibn Khalid al-Hudhali!
The Battle of Uhud ring any bells?
The Battle of the Trench?
Muhammad's massacre of the Qurayzah tribe?
But of course. Even though all history concerning Islam is violent we are still obligated to pretend it is the worlds most peaceful religion. The 11,059 recorded terrorist attacks committed by Muslims in the past 6 years are just a massive coincidence. The history if Islam being violent is a massive coincidence! The Quran ordering violence is a massive coincidence!
In fact, it's all just a coincidence which some how intelligent people mistakenly view as being related to Islam being violent!
Awesome story, lyounamu.
-----------------------------------
sam04u said:
worst of all is that in some demented way you believe that by attacking Islam you'll some way mend Israel's illegitimacy.
Your bias is quite strong. Now every criticism of a violent belief system is an excuse to legitimise Israel?
Snap out of it and see the world for what it is - namely, not part of a Jewish conspiracy theory involving the New World Order et al.
sam04u said:
1) You stated "Islam condones arbitrary violence during the time of Mohammed (PBUH)", yet almost all of the examples you cited were of defensive wars.
You really do have some habitual need to lie.
But I do get where you're coming from. They all deserved to be killed for not being Muslim. So obviously, it was a defensive war - killing innocent people and robbing them is retaliation for not accepting a megalomaniacs self procolmation as a prophet of god.
2) You show a complete lack of understanding of Islam e.g; You stated "Mohammed (PBUH) authored the Qur'an", now if that isn't an example of Islamic illiteracy I don't know what is. That's akin to saying "A pen authored a thesis" in muslim perspective.
Again you attempt to mislead.
Maybe you should quote me correctly for a change. The truth only hurts when you believe in a
lie, Sam.
And your analogy is quite hilarious. See, it relies on the assumption that there is a god named Allah who communicated to Muhammad via Gabriel. That is a far logical stretch I must say.
But as I and majority of the world do not believe the Quran to be the divine word of God it is I who stands correct (once again).
3) It's not your biased perspective of Islam that is valid in interpretting whether or not Islam condones or doesn't condone violence, but rather that of those that purport to follow it. If they (all or most) say it doesn't, then it doesn't.
But alas, they don't say it doesn't condone violence. In fact, many act out in compliance with the Quran killing hundreds daily. Odd dilema you find yourself in trying to wiggle out of it in this manner.
The fact that: 1) The Quran promotes violence; 2) Muhammad was violent; 3) The Quran is a product of this violence - is all concrete and whatever you and fellow apologists claim will never change that.
A complete fail Sam but I assume you are used to it by now.