JosephSeed
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2024
- Messages
- 149
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2024
dw lil bro i got youI aint getting the average. Someone gotta be in the bottom percentile
dw lil bro i got youI aint getting the average. Someone gotta be in the bottom percentile
I’ve heard 800+ wordshow much were we supposed to write? im curious bc i wrote very little for the amount of time we had. in exams 1 hour can get me like 1200 words and i only did like 550 each for lat.
north sydney girls and boys, ruse, baulko and ruse are public selectivewhat, which 5 are public?
public and selective are literal oppositesnorth sydney girls and boys, ruse, baulko and ruse are public selective
how? i assumed the context of the discussion was that private schools have inherent privilege because of the paywall and higher education, and under the government, selective schools get the same amount of funding as comprehensive high schools. the only difference between selective and non-selective public schools is the entrance test, as it is a test that is avaliable to the publicpublic and selective are literal opposites
Ngl as someone who went to an average public and then moved to a selective- your average selective definitely has more privilege than your average public even tho both r technically public. Lots of ppl who go to selective aren’t “ naturally gifted” but rather can afford lots of tutoring that your average individual can’t. Even if not everyone who goes to a selective is rich, just having the luxury to afford extensive tutoring is a privilege in it self. Selective schools also do have better teachers + resources than your average public. Like for e.g most public schools ( not selective) can’t afford Duke of Ed or many excursions- but I’ve found that selective schools have an abundance of those types of trips even when not rlly necessary.how? i assumed the context of the discussion was that private schools have inherent privilege because of the paywall and higher education, and under the government, selective schools get the same amount of funding as comprehensive high schools. the only difference between selective and non-selective public schools is the entrance test, as it is a test that is avaliable to the public
How r u guys preparing for that lat? I reckon I’m gonna look at the Oj Simpson defence to learn some ‘legalese’ and then do some practise responses.
WTAF IS LAT?? LATIN?? I see that everywhere I dont get it. never heard this word ever being used in rl ever tf is thatnot really, it just boosts your final mark, which is made up of your atar and adjustment facter and the LAT. i had a mates who got 50 and 30 but got atars of 97 and 92(this guy lived in a low socioeconomic area). that being said, im not getting in coz my atar is cooked
Bro https://www.unsw.edu.au/law-justice/study/undergraduate/law-admission-testWTAF IS LAT?? LATIN?? I see that everywhere I dont get it. never heard this word ever being used in rl ever tf is that
basically mate, the LAT is the law admission test done by UNSW. LAT for short.WTAF IS LAT?? LATIN?? I see that everywhere I dont get it. never heard this word ever being used in rl ever tf is that
LITERALLY THIS. I don't know why this is so difficult to acknowledge. I'm not calling private school kids privileged brats I'm just saying high ranking schools are usually private (and I thought selective was obvi)Ngl as someone who went to an average public and then moved to a selective- your average selective definitely has more privilege than your average public even tho both r technically public. Lots of ppl who go to selective aren’t “ naturally gifted” but rather can afford lots of tutoring that your average individual can’t. Even if not everyone who goes to a selective is rich, just having the luxury to afford extensive tutoring is a privilege in it self. Selective schools also do have better teachers + resources than your average public. Like for e.g most public schools ( not selective) can’t afford Duke of Ed or many excursions- but I’ve found that selective schools have an abundance of those types of trips even when not rlly necessary.
Ikr, sometimes I’m stunned how ppl literally don’t know thisLITERALLY THIS. I don't know why this is so difficult to acknowledge. I'm not calling private school kids privileged brats I'm just saying high ranking schools are usually private (and I thought selective was obvi)
LITERALLY THIS. I don't know why this is so difficult to acknowledge. I'm not calling private school kids privileged brats I'm just saying high ranking schools are usually private (and I thought selective was obvi)
i'm really sorry if i came off as ignorant i also attend a selective school, and i definitely do acknowledge my privilege as someone who is able to afford extra tutoring for some of my subjects, but i wanted to point out the fact that selective schools are, at the end of the day, also public schools, because unlike private, it is not always a pay-to-win as i have learned from a lot of my friends, who do not attend any tutoring and are extremely bright. selective schools indeed receive more opportunities offered by their schools because there is that recognition of a higher standard that is placed upon the students, but i was moreso trying to recognise that selective schools are almost always the best option for individuals who are striving to get a high atar, and are willing to put in hard work, but do not necessarily have the resources available to pay for private schools, who otherwise dominate the hsc rankings. again, i'm really sorry if it sounded like i was ignoring the whole selective school tutoring privilege factIkr, sometimes I’m stunned how ppl literally don’t know this
Look I understand where you’re coming from but just bc selective schools r technically “public” doesn’t mean they‘re similar to your average public school. While there a few naturally bright individuals with no tutoring, I’d argue that more than 95% of ppl who got into selective only did so bc of tutoring ( which most still do for the hsc let’s be real)- which does make acceptance a more pay-to-win system. This is coming from someone who did go to a public school hs before attending a selective one so the inequality is a way more obvious to me. You don’t sound ignorant tho, the things u say about selective schools like about the opportunities offered r true, but personally to me, I don’t believe someone should warrant a better education ( the resources and opportunities I mean) for a test they did in year 6. Like that’s not a great indicator of intelligence lol ( personal gripe )i'm really sorry if i came off as ignorant i also attend a selective school, and i definitely do acknowledge my privilege as someone who is able to afford extra tutoring for some of my subjects, but i wanted to point out the fact that selective schools are, at the end of the day, also public schools, because unlike private, it is not always a pay-to-win as i have learned from a lot of my friends, who do not attend any tutoring and are extremely bright. selective schools indeed receive more opportunities offered by their schools because there is that recognition of a higher standard that is placed upon the students, but i was moreso trying to recognise that selective schools are almost always the best option for individuals who are striving to get a high atar, and are willing to put in hard work, but do not necessarily have the resources available to pay for private schools, who otherwise dominate the hsc rankings. again, i'm really sorry if it sounded like i was ignoring the whole selective school tutoring privilege fact
Definitely, I was always a dumb primary school kid with a poor education and would never be considered for selective schooling. As someone who is trying to make an academic comeback, excelling in an environment with non-atar students and people with 0 academic drive can make it hard to stay motivated. I swear I'm first in some of my classes with a mid band 5 and struggle to improve because there's 0 collaboration in my classes because their busy watching race car videos and online shopping.Look I understand where you’re coming from but just bc selective schools r technically “public” doesn’t mean they‘re similar to your average public school. While there a few naturally bright individuals with no tutoring, I’d argue that more than 95% of ppl who got into selective only did so bc of tutoring ( which most still do for the hsc let’s be real)- which does make acceptance a more pay-to-win system. This is coming from someone who did go to a public school hs before attending a selective one so the inequality is a way more obvious to me. You don’t sound ignorant tho, the things u say about selective schools like about the opportunities offered r true, but personally to me, I don’t believe someone should warrant a better education ( the resources and opportunities I mean) for a test they did in year 6. Like that’s not a great indicator of intelligence lol ( personal gripe )
dw, also don't think that I'm privilege shaming you btw. considering you're on the LAT chat you probably work your butt offi'm really sorry if i came off as ignorant i also attend a selective school, and i definitely do acknowledge my privilege as someone who is able to afford extra tutoring for some of my subjects, but i wanted to point out the fact that selective schools are, at the end of the day, also public schools, because unlike private, it is not always a pay-to-win as i have learned from a lot of my friends, who do not attend any tutoring and are extremely bright. selective schools indeed receive more opportunities offered by their schools because there is that recognition of a higher standard that is placed upon the students, but i was moreso trying to recognise that selective schools are almost always the best option for individuals who are striving to get a high atar, and are willing to put in hard work, but do not necessarily have the resources available to pay for private schools, who otherwise dominate the hsc rankings. again, i'm really sorry if it sounded like i was ignoring the whole selective school tutoring privilege fact