Grey Council
Legend
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2003
- Messages
- 1,426
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2004
roflmao
*awaits the 'bitch' slap to fall on Keypad*
*awaits the 'bitch' slap to fall on Keypad*
What are you, an idiot? Why do you think girls suck at maths? It's because they're not in this forum.Originally posted by GuardiaN
roflmao
*awaits the 'bitch' slap to fall on Keypad*
hahahaha... this is funny shit. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:Originally posted by KeypadSDM
What are you, an idiot? Why do you think girls suck at maths? It's because they're not in this forum.
Then shut up, and don't reply.Originally posted by miss_pie
this bullshit doesn't even deserve a reply
I think they just want to make sure that the top 3 unit student who didn't do 4u maths isn't disadvantaged (same thing for 2 unit students who didn't do 3u maths)... they may well be capable of doing 3 unit - you can be good at something that you don't like, and similarly be bad at something that you really like.Originally posted by abdooooo!!!
yeah the person who topped it got 101... one mark higher than Keypad's 100. LOL
board of study is totally weird... why can't they just make a different ranking system for 4u students instead of saying that the actual top of the 3u exam came second because he/she did 4u... but a 'she' is highly unlikely... its math
don't you think social environment got something to do with that? considering all the good maths/science female elites were rarely acknowledged because whilst they may have achieved to the same extent as their male counterparts, they may also have been burdened with other family chores? (i read about a few really really great female mathematicians in our maths corridor... and i couldn't help feeling disappointed). And plus, many girls, even in 2004 now, ain't receiving a proper education... we may be missing out on a lotta female geniusOriginally posted by abdooooo!!!
a she can not think like a he. its really in the chromosomes and your genome build that is affecting one's ability. i have reason to believe that this smart at math and science, and crap at language and coordination gene is at the Y chromosome... so if you were lucky enough to recieve a Y chromosome then you'll most likely be better at math than 50% of the people if you tried equally as hard.
judging on the explicit extent to which you know what goes on in the head of ladies, I s'ppose you have done the operation already...Originally posted by KeyPadSDM
All those extra genes just fuck with the head. Most females are too confused about themselves to even contemplate doing well in maths.
what do you mean years go on? you're sexiest as well merc... a 'he' will always rule in math and science (not the hsc version), just like a 'she' will always be good at the so called 'humanity' subjects and langauge. she talks he thinks... its how evolution made us.Originally posted by mercury
And although a 'she' is unlikely, it's not highly as the years go on, i think 'she's would be much better at maths/science, and similarly 'he's be much better at english/humanity
hahaha... i know that. we guy's suffer at the hands of the law of probability. but i don't know, i still think guys are good at math and science because of that reason. but it doesn't mean girls can't be good... its just that there must be some form of mutation in the genes to make really really good, or else they're just try hard girls who wants to be mathematicians.Originally posted by mercury
don't you think social environment got something to do with that? considering all the good maths/science female elites were rarely acknowledged because whilst they may have achieved to the same extent as their male counterparts, they may also have been burdened with other family chores? (i read about a few really really great female mathematicians in our maths corridor... and i couldn't help feeling disappointed). And plus, many girls, even in 2004 now, ain't receiving a proper education... we may be missing out on a lotta female genius
Whilst 'tis true observation that boys tend to perform better at maths/science than girls, I think it has nothing to do with having a Y chromosome - although on the other hand, genetically speaking, many hereditary diseases have a greater impact on males than females, in simple terms: Xgood Xbad mostly make a female carrier, but Xbad Ygood or Xgood Ybad would make the guy done for...
physically power doesn't necessary make you dominant
but you're right in saying that smart girls are not well received by society because we males are more powerful physically to start with hence we want to destroy you females. so still it comes down to genes.
you are a girl therefore you are sexist... everyone is... except for them gay people.Originally posted by mercury
why am i sexist? What I mean is, proper education for girls only had a short life span (relatively). And i disagree that guys will always rule in maths and science, first of all, define "rule", if you are talking about scientific and mathematical achievements... i concede that currently it's mostly guys, but i hope to see it changed such that there will be more elite female scientists as well. The movement for equal opportunities for all children in all parts of world is still quite young
she talks and he thinks.... while that's what appears to be the primary trend, more and more of guys and girls begin to talk AND think... well I hope... hehe
i think my sentence structure is a little off. what i mean is that if a girl wants to be a mathematician there are two ways: try really really hard, or have gene mutation.Originally posted by mercury
And I disagree that gene mutation is necessary for a girl to become a mathematician
what ways? how do you beat up a guy who is twice your size?Originally posted by mercury
physically power doesn't necessary make you dominant
there are many other means through which girls can make a guy done for (of course i'm not in support of any such means if it had no legitimate purpose). The biological difference between girls and guys have both good and bad sides... nature is fair