• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Mc. Q9 (1 Viewer)

Komaticom

Bored Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
589
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2008
I couldn't do this one.
How does knowing the mass of NO and O3 help in finding mass (hence volume) of NO2?
 

dingding

Señor Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2004
Messages
111
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
you work out the moles of the reactants, then find which is the limiting reactant, then you know how many moles of product and therefore volume.
 

xeriphic

Member
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
452
Location
Sydney
this case you have to do the above two times for NO2 and O3, you would notice O3 with the lower value hence the answer, limiting reagent of the reaction
 

KungPow

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
76
Location
Sydney
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
Ah crap that doesn't sound like what I did. What was the final answer then?
 

Steven12

Lord Chubbington
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Messages
407
Location
sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
final answer was A

I put D cos i didnt realise the limiting reagen. i am doomed
 

KungPow

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
76
Location
Sydney
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
Well I had A and what I assumed was:

The mass of the two reactants would be the same as the two products.
Thus NO2 + O2 = 0.66 + 0.72
Then I just assumed that the mass of NO2 was half of that.
Then you can work out number of moles, since you have mass and molar mass (work it out)
Then with number of moles you can work out volume (by multiplying with 22.71)

Yeah I know crazy way of thinking but hey, it got me an answer that was one of the choices, which is more than i can say for the other question!
 

speedy3020

New Member
Joined
May 9, 2004
Messages
3
Well i dont know what limiting reagent you're talking about steven12 but i ended up with something like 0.4995 so D at 0.50L
 

sub

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
621
A!!! YES!! right again...suk that chem...sub is moving up in the world! :uhhuh:
but i screwed the rest up :(
 

Timmy-V

New Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2004
Messages
10
KungPow said:
Well I had A and what I assumed was:

The mass of the two reactants would be the same as the two products.
Thus NO2 + O2 = 0.66 + 0.72
Then I just assumed that the mass of NO2 was half of that.
Then you can work out number of moles, since you have mass and molar mass (work it out)
Then with number of moles you can work out volume (by multiplying with 22.71)

Yeah I know crazy way of thinking but hey, it got me an answer that was one of the choices, which is more than i can say for the other question!
Yeah that is what I did... It seems pretty much right too me.
 

Komaticom

Bored Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
589
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2008
Did anybody here get this question right without guessing any single step in the calculation process?!
 

Brad

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2003
Messages
394
Location
State of mind
I Just thought that since O2 gave the lower value or someshit, that it was the limiting reagent and therefore the reaction could not continue without any moles of O2 left therefore the maximum amount of The product is the same number of moles as there is of O2

n=0.72/48
n=0.015
0.015=m/(whatever the molar mass of NO2 is)
Which gave A
 

Komaticom

Bored Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
589
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2008
Thanks Brad.
Can't rep ya, argh. Have to spread some around first. *grumble grumble*
 

sub

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
621
Brad said:
I Just thought that since O2 gave the lower value or someshit, that it was the limiting reagent and therefore the reaction could not continue without any moles of O2 left therefore the maximum amount of The product is the same number of moles as there is of O2

n=0.72/48
n=0.015
0.015=m/(whatever the molar mass of NO2 is)
Which gave A

uhh, dude its O3...
 

lucyinthehole

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Messages
256
i did some crazy calculations that even i can't remember, that gave me 0.68. i divided that by 2 to get 0.34. i was more striving towards one of the answers, as opposed to actually knowing how to do it :p
 

lukebennett

Happy Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
1,216
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
you just had to realise that you needed ratio of mole 1:1, which meant that you were limited by the smallest number of moles. if different number of moles react the ratio in the reaction would be wrong
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top