chewy123 said:
Why? Isn't the marks the determinant of the teachers' belief?
Yes, but that's obviously not the issue here.
You get marked on an ongoing basis, it has nothing to do with what teachers' believe at any given time outside of every single time they marked you.
They do not compare students and rank them in the manner you suggested (by comparing them), they simply give them marks for each assignment. If, at the end, the marks are equal, then you have the same rank. End of story.
Nonetheless, from experience I noted that teachers generally want to create a larger spread in ranks,
Um, you can't have a large spread in ranks. A rank goes from first to last, you cannot spread it out without adding fake statistical results... I've never heard of a school spreading out ranks by adding fake students. Maybe it's just me.
clustering everyone together isn't a good thing.
Actually, if you're setting appropriate assessment tasks, you'd be hoping for a bellcurve... Not sure what you're going on about.
If the standard of a particular assessment is high, they would mark harsher just so few receive the same mark as a result.
What...? Who would receive the same mark as whom? Why are you talking about marks now when before you were talking about ranks...? :-S