speersy
Member
O.k i thought i knew what the meissner effect was.
Here is what i thought it was:
The relative motion of a magnet above the superconductor induces eddy currents in the superconducor which by Lenz's law set up a magnetic field to oppose the magnets motion. Since the superconductor has no resistance the induced currents and magnetic field is as strong as the magnetic field of the magnet. So the interaction of these two magnetic fields causes the magnet to hover above the superconductor.
There is obviously huge flaws in this explanation like why if the magnet is stationary are eddy currents and hence a magnetic field induced in the superconductor?
Can someone please explain
Here is what i thought it was:
The relative motion of a magnet above the superconductor induces eddy currents in the superconducor which by Lenz's law set up a magnetic field to oppose the magnets motion. Since the superconductor has no resistance the induced currents and magnetic field is as strong as the magnetic field of the magnet. So the interaction of these two magnetic fields causes the magnet to hover above the superconductor.
There is obviously huge flaws in this explanation like why if the magnet is stationary are eddy currents and hence a magnetic field induced in the superconductor?
Can someone please explain