dannielle_93
Member
haha agreed but then again im "shit at pe" apparently haha.It's pretty sad if he's actually serious, lol!
haha agreed but then again im "shit at pe" apparently haha.It's pretty sad if he's actually serious, lol!
Which would mean I would have to be too because I also chose D! Shit, most of the state must be shit at PE!haha agreed but then again im "shit at pe" apparently haha.
dude I think my dreams of attending UNSW are over now, I put D as well but now im gonna fail cos it isnt the right answer!!! =( my life is over =(Which would mean I would have to be too because I also chose D! Shit, most of the state must be shit at PE!
dude I think my dreams of attending UNSW are over now, I put D as well but now im gonna fail cos it isnt the right answer!!! =( my life is over =(
oh wow! when will they tell me what my mark is =/ How come they told you and not me?? =(michael i know who you are we know each other
i am rank 1 at my school so dont try and take me on i just received a phone call from my teacher to notify i got a band 6, ill deck the shit out of you
OMG can't believe you chose D we are soooo stupid haha, looks like we will have to repeat year 12..dude I think my dreams of attending UNSW are over now, I put D as well but now im gonna fail cos it isnt the right answer!!! =( my life is over =(
Im going to have to make new friends =(OMG can't believe you chose D we are soooo stupid haha, looks like we will have to repeat year 12..
michael i know who you are we know each other
i am rank 1 at my school so dont try and take me on i just received a phone call from my teacher to notify i got a band 6, ill deck the shit out of you
B - Morbidity has nothing to do with it.for question 8, A and C say "initiatives prior to the 1970s"
now, this means a 'significant' reduction of mortality would have been evidenced before and at 1970s
from the graph, it shows a gradual decrease from the 1950s
hence, A and C are ruled out.
This leaves C and D. Deaths per population has nothing to do with life expectancy, so D is the most correct answer by logic, confirmed with 2 pdhpe teachers now
Extended rest period - positive? Are you soft? D is the best answer as a free lunch is obviously a good thing, and thus positive, and a free lunch from the school makes it extrinsic. You're high.your a massive gimp 17 is A, school sporting team promised lunch is only external champ, where as A is both positive and extrinsic
you obviously are shit at pdhpe
No if the potential for prevention was low they wouldnt bother using limited funds for prevention because if the potential for prevention is low then it is pointless. If the potential for prevention is high then they will use limited funds for prevention because the chances that it will be effective and actually make a difference, are highguys can u help me clarify question 10. wouldnt it be more of a PRIORITY ISSUE if potential for prevention was lower? Cant cure it, therefore it needs more attension ... sigh fml