OK it is HIM, HE, MALE, HIS etc!timrie6 said:I voted waterfowl because I always get into fights with him/her over his/her insane views
shutup woman.waterfowl said:OK it is HIM, HE, MALE, HIS etc!
And how nice, intolerant and prejudice of you to call my views insane.
lol, I thought you were a girl for ages.waterfowl said:OK it is HIM, HE, MALE, HIS etc!
And how nice, intolerant and prejudice of you to call my views insane.
The thing is though, that he would probably enjoy it.LadyBec said:I voted for tattoed guy.
His views on rape are disgusting. Enough said.
Meanwhile....it's my hope that someday a girl will tie him down and rape him. See how you feel then you fuckwit.
*calms down*
thorrnydevil said:Rape is rape. Even if they enjoy it, it's still rape.
However, it is possible for a man to gain an erection from not be sexually turned on. The female may be stroking his penis, etc., which creates his erection. The laws should be the same for both genders.Bone577 said:Not necessarily. If a girl is being raped it is irrelevant whether they enjoy it or not. It would be almost impossible to give evidence to say she was enjoying it or not.
But, there is no such thing as a female raping a guy in Australian law (not vagina-penis sex anyway) the logic being that to rape in such a manner would require the guy to have an erection, hence he is gaining pleasure hence it is not rape.
The law is not the same for both genders, and rightly soo IMO.
Back to the point, Rorix all the way, flamer/troller extrodinare.
edit:Not to mention the sticky caps-lock.
Indeed.Not-That-Bright said:really, so if a girl can force herself upon a guy and make him get an erection.. it's not rape?
Asquithian said:if the girl consents its not sexual assault...whether she enjoyed it or not is nor relevant
(remember guys rape is not mentioned in NSW law...its sexual assault)