Ok, here's what we said (For short let's call pinkblinkbarbie PBB):
Me - Makes point about the causes of a girls sadness possibly not being because they're treated like shit (implying they weren't), and because they're just emotionally decrepit (because they're women)
PBB - Makes broad generalisation that my "alot of people not being able to make the distinction" statement is false. Then running along a tangent about how "not feeling loved" and "being treated like shit" is "the same reason".
Me - Refocuses my point about the distinction that girls can't make. Then brings it along to validation (which, if my statement is true, is the reason she's crying, she's not feeling validated)
PBB - Refers to specific case, clearly seperate from my generalisation.
Me - States that what I'm saying relates to most cases. Not necessarily a specific one.
PBB - Attacks me saying "I wouldn't know" [And of course she would]. Then brings it around to how domestic abusers justify themselves, and women being trated like slaves [wtf?]. And let's not forget the sexism.
Me - Restates what I said into one post. Then retaliates the attack.
PBB - Attacks back.
Me - Rejustifies self. Attacks back.
PBB - Waits for someone to defend what she was saying, and then retalliates saying she didn't "ask for criticism" [Implying that all people who need to be criticised must ask, and also implying that I criticised her], then made another broad generalisation about how since you got someone to defend you that you must instantly have a majority of support.
See simple. It's not rocket science, just follow what I said. The main problem with your responses is that it didn't address the issue I brough up about how guys get blamed even when it's not their fault, because they're not "attached" enough. Again I reiterate don't [speaking generally] confuse the two when you're in an emotionally unstable state, which is often the case. Just because we don't validate you doesn't mean we don't appreciate you.
