Inhuman
Member
How about that 8 marker? I thought it was really interesting how this year they wanted you to relate the core to your option
yeah man - it was a pretty good question for 8 marks... i thought it woulda been desribe analyse and assesOriginally posted by McDaddy
I thought it was weird how for an 8 mark question we only had to describe (Q2Q). Think I did alright though.
2 pages? man i couldnt stop blabbing for that question - i think i wrote 3 pages and 2 lines... LOLOriginally posted by iH
the nuclear fission ones were good too. the transmutation was fairly obvious i thought. and then i did the nuclear bomb/nuclear reactors for the final question. wrote about 2 pages on it.
oh don't get me wrong. i had plenty more to write. coulda gone for pages.... but i stopped myself...though i did have an hour spare at the end of the exam to be bored. coulda just written more i spose... i just explained how the thing was used in nuclear fission, how the chain reaction works, how that's applicable in a nuclear bomb, bit about effects on japan, how it can be controlled for use in a nuclear reactor using control rods etc.Originally posted by ToOhEyZ
2 pages? man i couldnt stop blabbing for that question - i think i wrote 3 pages and 2 lines... LOL
yeah i dont think i answered the quesion right though - so thats prob why.. LOL
I agree, astro was pretty good. Our trial was harder than that. Heh, I didn't even see the evolutionary pathways thing until the end, so I had to refer the marker to a diff page in the booklet for that.Originally posted by Dash
I was a little screwed on the evolutionary pathways for astro. But other than that, it was all good
HA! I wrote 2 pages on that question and I got attacked by my fellow physicists after the exam for writing so much.Originally posted by ToOhEyZ
2 pages? man i couldnt stop blabbing for that question - i think i wrote 3 pages and 2 lines... LOL
yeah i dont think i answered the quesion right though - so thats prob why.. LOL