note when dividing LHS by Z cubed you get:
Thankyou! Now it makes much more sense.note when dividing LHS by Z cubed you get:
z^3+z^-3
it is known that:
cis(nx)+cis(-nx)=2cos(nx)
Thus using this on the new LHS statement you gain, where n=3:
2cos(3 theta)
Now since you have to divide RHS by z^3, split up the division into dividing by z, 3 times. Now divide each of the brackets by z only thus:
RHS= (z+z^-1)(z-sqrt(3)+z^-1)(z+sqrt(3)+z^-1)
then collecting the applying the rule in the second line above you get:
(2cos(theta))(2cos(theta)-sqrt(3))(2cos(theta)+sqrt(3))
then taking 2 out of each of the brackets and dividing both RHS and LHS by 2 you get:
cos(3 theta) =4cos(theta)(cos(theta)-cos(pi/6))(cos(theta)+cos(5pi/6))
As required.
is true only if the complex number has a modulus of 1, for the reasons noted inWhat you see here is the application of De Moivre's Theorem, and note that adding a complex number to its inverse is the same as adding a complex number to its conjugate.
For a general complex number , of any modulus, like , the result is true for all , but the result for does not generalise.It is shown that .
Note that the product of z and its conjugate becomes 1 as the radius is 1.
Thank you for demystifying my work. Sometimes there needs to be a disclaimer so that people do not get misled.Note that the statement
is true only if the complex number has a modulus of 1, for the reasons noted in
For a general complex number , of any modulus, like , the result is true for all , but the result for does not generalise.
No problem, I see part of my role as clarifying for the sake of other readers. I think it helps everyone to be confident that information is reliable, and I hope it encourages students to help each other, knowing that any mistakes will be corrected and issues clarified so that they can become part of the learning process.Thank you for demystifying my work. Sometimes there needs to be a disclaimer so that people do not get misled.