MoonlightSonata
Retired
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2002
- Messages
- 3,645
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- N/A
Ellie-Bee said:
Ellie-Bee said:
Really?Sarah168 said:of course but everyone seems to be expecting this movie to be like the 1995 version...
I'm not sure one can claim not to be an Austen fan without have first read P&Pjhakka said:In any situation, I would reccomend the book. I haven't read Pride and Prejudice, since I am not an Austen fan, but I believe that it is always good to look at the one that came first.
Well, if you keep in mind that Lydia and Kitty are supposed to be very silly young girls, then that's understandable.keladry said:hmmm... first thing i thought was "damn that's colourful!"
are girls supposed to be that... um... excitable... in the regency era?
still not liking the keira knightley idea *wrinkles nose*
Yes I agree, Jane in the BBC version looked somewhat like a horsemalkin86 said:And if you remember that Jane is supposed to be the beauty of the family, and Elizabeth only the second-best, then in a way, Keira works better than Jennifer Ehle - she was just too beautiful.
I thought she looked healthy.. classical and beautiful. The new Jane looks too young and waifish to be Keira Knightley's older sister.MoonlightSonata said:Yes I agree, Jane in the BBC version looked somewhat like a horse