Question 1!! (2 Viewers)

[lazybum]

it definitely was not postmodernist - if anyone noticed, the source was written in 1964, the school of postmodernism began in the 70's - duh!!!
i just picked out relelvant stuff, i debated the source and said that was a traditional view, but a postmodern view is that truth is relative to ppl and culture etc etc, too tired to write more

 

[MiuMiu]

Originally posted by lazybum
it definitely was not postmodernist - if anyone noticed, the source was written in 1964, the school of postmodernism began in the 70's - duh!!!

A name was put to it in the 70s, the theory existed for much longer than that.

 

[MiuMiu]

Originally posted by lazybum
i debated the source and said that was a traditional view, but a postmodern view is that truth is relative to ppl and culture etc etc, too tired to write more

Thats exactly what the source said, read the last couple of sentences about context and culture...

 

[shelley]

well i linked the article to the modernist theory...i kinda though it was commenting on the approach of modernist historians...gulp...now im worried

 

[MiuMiu]

As long as you supported what you said I don't think it matters too much...

 

[lazybum]

i believe i put in a good arguement ms 12 - that's the most important thing

 

[MiuMiu]

thats right, it was up to interpretation and they can't say your interpretation was wrong if you supported it.