• Want to take part in this year's BoS Trials event for Maths and/or Business Studies?
    Click here for details and register now!
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

Question on exponential intergration (1 Viewer)

squeenie

And goodness knows...
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
663
Location
Utopia Parkway
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
This question is from Maths in Focus (revised edition), page 152

8. Use Simpson's rule with 5 function values to find the volume of the solid formed when the curve y=e^x is rotated about the y-axis from y=3 to y=5, correct to 2 significant figures.

According to the book, the answer is 12, but every time I've tried it, I always seem to get around 8.64, depending on the method I use (I've done Simpson's rule as well as regular intergration and graphing the equation)

Can someone tell me if I'm right?
 

tommykins

i am number -e^i*pi
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
5,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
回复: Question on exponential intergration

i've never used the simpsons rule to find the volume of a solid, but i'm guessing you need to apply it to x^2 dy and then multiply that by pi.

y = e^x -> x = ln y -> x^2 = (lny)^2

v = pi * simpsons rule + (lny)^2

I'd have no clue how you'd integrate lny with only 2unit knowledge.

Shit question IMO
 

squeenie

And goodness knows...
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
663
Location
Utopia Parkway
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
Re: 回复: Question on exponential intergration

tommykins said:
Shit question IMO
You know, that's what I was thinking too. I tried re-arranging to lny^2 using log laws, but that just made things worse. Oh well. Maths in Focus isn't a really good textbook anyways.
 

me121

Premium Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
1,407
Location
-33.917188, 151.232890
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
the method tommykins suggested is proably what they expect..

but an alternate method (which would give different results) would be to take an even grid of points under the surface and fit paraboloids to each 2D section.. then sum these up..


but to int ln(y).. we can just integrate exponential function and use the fact that the inverse of ln is exp
 
Last edited:

squeenie

And goodness knows...
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
663
Location
Utopia Parkway
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
me121 said:
but an alternate method (which would give different results) would be to take an even grid of points under the surface and fit paraboloids to each 2D section.. then sum these up..
So would that be something like the trapezoidal rule?
 

me121

Premium Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
1,407
Location
-33.917188, 151.232890
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
squeenie said:
So would that be something like the trapezoidal rule?
no.

the method that they probably expect (and is probably correct, and is what i did when i was doing the hsc) would be to use Pi*int(x^2) dy (or y^2 depending on which axis), but use simpsons rule to evaluate the integral.

the above method is what you should do.

i was going to far in mentioning that other method, and you would never do it in an exam. it is a whole different approach to the problem..

if you really are interested, then continue on.
================================= (this should really go in the extra-curricula maths sub-forum..)
here is what i was thinking.. ...an interesting way of looking at the problem is to use an extended version of simpsons rule for double integrals (i.e. area under a surface, i.e. to find volumes)..

the trapezoidal rule joins a straight line between points and find simple areas.. simpsons rule fits parabolas in between points and uses the fact that we know how to evaluate the area under a parabola.

why not extend this to splitting the surface into a square grid and fit paraboloids to the 4 grid points. (not sure if this is possible).. then use the fact that you know (or at least can try to work out) the volume under a paraboloid.

i'm interested to see what Derek has to say about this. because i don't know enough maths to know what i am talking about.
 
Last edited:

Mark576

Feel good ...
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
515
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
squeenie said:
This question is from Maths in Focus (revised edition), page 152

8. Use Simpson's rule with 5 function values to find the volume of the solid formed when the curve y=e^x is rotated about the y-axis from y=3 to y=5, correct to 2 significant figures.

According to the book, the answer is 12, but every time I've tried it, I always seem to get around 8.64, depending on the method I use (I've done Simpson's rule as well as regular intergration and graphing the equation)

Can someone tell me if I'm right?
y=ex
x=lny => x2=(lny)2
V = pi[3-->5]∫(lny)2dy
Using simpson's rule, we first evaluate [3-->5]∫(lny)2dy:

Hence:
I=2/12[(ln3)2+(ln5)2+4((ln3.5)2+(ln4.5)2)+2(ln4)2]=3.827919825

Now to find the volume, we need to multiply by pi which gives: 12.0257648
 

squeenie

And goodness knows...
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
663
Location
Utopia Parkway
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
Mark576 said:
y=ex
x=lny => x2=(lny)2
V = pi[3-->5]∫(lny)2dy
Using simpson's rule, we first evaluate [3-->5]∫(lny)2dy:

Hence:
I=2/12[(ln3)2+(ln5)2+4((ln3.5)2+(ln4.5)2)+2(ln4)2]=3.827919825

Now to find the volume, we need to multiply by pi which gives: 12.0257648
Hey, thanks! I tried that before, but I got something else other than 2/12 at the start, somehow.
 

tommykins

i am number -e^i*pi
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
5,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Mark576 said:
y=ex
x=lny => x2=(lny)2
V = pi[3-->5]∫(lny)2dy
Using simpson's rule, we first evaluate [3-->5]∫(lny)2dy:

Hence:
I=2/12[(ln3)2+(ln5)2+4((ln3.5)2+(ln4.5)2)+2(ln4)2]=3.827919825

Now to find the volume, we need to multiply by pi which gives: 12.0257648
Thanks for filling in my laziness :)
 

conics2008

Active Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
1,228
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Hey in 2unit if you cant integrate a function with 2unit knowledge always use approx areas and then to find volume multiply it with pi =)

thats the 2unit stuff =)

or you can use this rule... integration by parts...

use the fact that S ln(x) = x(ln(x)-1)

therefore by parts

ln(x)^2 = ln(x).ln(x)

therefore int = x[ln(x)]^2 - 2xln[x] + 2x sub in your limits xD

good day =)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top