• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Question on sex. (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

nwatts

Active Member
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
1,938
Location
Greater Bulli
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
Born Dancer said:
this is going to make me sound like a fool because his posts seemingly contradict it, but nwatts is not a homophobe.
it's true, i'm prejudiced against idiots, not homosexuals
 

ElGronko

Not premium
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
1,034
Location
Yes
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
dagwoman said:
YAY! Some more sanity! Great advice to both the poster and the homophobes :)
Woah...I am not homophobic, I would never discriminate against someone based on their sexuality alone, that is ridiculous and irrational.

What is also irrational is claiming that two females can have sex.

it is just not physiologically possible. Calling it sex is just wrong. It is incorrect. There is no subjectivity or opinion in this argument. It cannot be biased by anyone's feelings or preferences. It is black and white. Scientifically speaking two females cannot have sexual intercourse, to say that they can is misusing the term.

That is all.
 

swanelle

New Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
5
Gender
Female
HSC
2006
I don't mean to insult anyone but whoever made the sandwich comment/substitution - well, i think you're pretty hilarious!

Although, I do understand how dagwooman may of been insulted by some of the comments posted here. I'm straight (not that it matters) but one of my friends is a lesbian, and in religion i sit next to her while we have to listen to our teacher, go on and on about how homosexauality is immoral and a sin. In my opinion that's just oh-so-stupid. Not to mention extremely backward!
And I'm sure that, although we may have different defintions of sex, that's something most of us will agree on!
 

nwatts

Active Member
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
1,938
Location
Greater Bulli
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
MzbLaZeIT said:
yeah whats the go!!
loosseeenn yourself up with a bit of late night finger fun while you're alone in bed to prepare yourself!!!
"late night finger fun"

shit you score high on the eloquence meter
 

etnelav

New Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
25
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
dagwoman said:
I don't believe in the bible because it's an archaic expression of ignorant, arrogant people who knew nothing about science and used God as a way of making them feel special and unique. I believe in the "big bang" theory and evolution trhough natural selection, as opposed to "the earth was made in seven days" crap the bible states. I don't need "help" and I don't need the promise of "heaven" when I die to live in a way I believe is moral.

If you want to have any more debate on that, go to the relevant threads in the Politics and Current Affairs forum.
sorry about the topic of this thread being jepardised but i cant believe the ignorance of comments like this above ^^

I'm no bible lover, but i do go to a catholic school and the first thing they teach you is that the books of genesis (which explain how the world was created in multipule senarios) are not to be taken as fact. These stories were invented by the hebrew slaves in Egypt as a means to prove to the top dude that they had a God- thereby entitling them to a day of rest.

Anyone who argues that they don't believe in the
crap the bible states
because the creation stories are ludicris- are completely ignorant of why the creation stories are in the bible and have no foundation to their knowledge (i.e- that of a 4th grader)

I would appreciate it then if people who dont fully understand the relvance of Biblical stories- to withhold their undeveloped thoughts, which can only serve to make everyone else as stupid as them.
 

BradCube

Active Member
Joined
May 16, 2005
Messages
1,288
Location
Charlestown
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
sunjet said:
ben* said:
"i already agreed that people without heads cant eat sandwhiches in terms of putting food inside their mouth. they can however, eat sandwhichs, and they can eat, as i dont believe eating is limited between food and mouths"
i loled.
I loled for 2 mins straight - that was beautiful.
 

Sandez

Hay Guys
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
91
Location
Blue Mountains
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
etnelav said:
sorry about the topic of this thread being jepardised but i cant believe the ignorance of comments like this above ^^

I'm no bible lover, but i do go to a catholic school and the first thing they teach you is that the books of genesis (which explain how the world was created in multipule senarios) are not to be taken as fact. These stories were invented by the hebrew slaves in Egypt as a means to prove to the top dude that they had a God- thereby entitling them to a day of rest.

Anyone who argues that they don't believe in the because the creation stories are ludicris- are completely ignorant of why the creation stories are in the bible and have no foundation to their knowledge (i.e- that of a 4th grader)

I would appreciate it then if people who dont fully understand the relvance of Biblical stories- to withhold their undeveloped thoughts, which can only serve to make everyone else as stupid as them.
Oh please, give that a rest.

I go to an Anglican school and remember being taught to take every word of the Bible as fact.

Also- many Catholics believe the Earth is 6000 years old. That's in Genesis, as is Creation.

And as for the topic, if it hasn't been said already, put it in her butt.
 

stamos

sellout
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
527
Location
room 237
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
er it's not catholic doctorine that the earth was created 6000 years ago

john paul II acknowledged the big bang in papal encyclicals, which are documents stating the position of catholic doctorine with regard to specific issues in the world at present

so they're wrong, and you're wrong to speak as though you're some theological expert
 

Ben*

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
35
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
hence by mathematical induction, if 'dagwoman is gay' is true, 'dagwoman is a total ignorant carpet munching fag' is also true, therfore n true for all 2,3,4 etc for all n > 1
 

dagwoman

Welcome to My Lair
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Messages
1,028
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Ben*, I shall quote the immortal words of Jenny Schecter:

"We're not fags, we're dykes, you asshole"
 

dagwoman

Welcome to My Lair
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Messages
1,028
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
And you’re an asshole who acts like a dick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top