MedVision ad

Quick integration question (1 Viewer)

hermand

je t'aime.
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
1,432
Gender
Female
HSC
2009






taking a common denominator in the numerator then will transfer to the denominator of the entire fraction.




EDIT; shit, i differentiated.
sorry!
 
Last edited:

lolokay

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
1,015
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009

integrate first part with trig substitution
 

trailblazer

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
64
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2009






taking a common denominator in the numerator then will transfer to the denominator of the entire fraction.




EDIT; shit, i differentiated.
sorry!
LOL, thought you were doing some awesome method, before i realised it was the quotient rule.
 

Manboobs

New Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
7
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
you could use the quotient rule that way if you wanted. It's similar to the parts method.

u an v are functions of x . Integrating the quotient rule.





Rearranging


So just using a substitution and the answer will pop out. Albeit being pretty neat, using this method is only useful in certain cases.
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,385
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
The "integration by reverse quotient rule" is exactly the same as integration by parts, except far more complicated. You're better off integrating by parts because the quotient rule is basically the product rule applied on u x 1/v.
However, the method lolokay suggested is by far the most efficient method that I know of, which is basically a "partial fractions" method by splitting the numerator.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top