poloktim
\(^o^)/
I don't have anything to say for the first or third points.Not-That-Bright said:- There is no evidence of a drug smuggling ring in Australian airports using unwitting stooges, furthermore no evidence of one in relation to bali.
- The bag seems a great fit for the boogey board bag.
- Testimony of Airport officials that claim she tried to prevent them opening the bag.
- The fact that Indonesian officials did agree to allowing fingerprinting to be done by the AFP, however corby's legal team disallowed it.
- The fact that we do know expats/other foreigners are willing to pay extra for pot from australians, by australians.
The second point seems circumstantial to me. Sort of like, if the glove fits, wear it when the glove could fit hundreds upon thousands of others.
The last point? How do we know this? Evidence? Or is this more of an opinion that we're supposed to know as a fact when it's really not by using common sense?
I don't really care if she's guilty or not. But those two points are kind of iffy. The others I'll accept (though I'm sure there'll be counterarguments to these facts), but those two look really iffy to me. One looking circumstantial and the other being speculation.