Logain
aka Will, Skis, Willskis
Hmm, damn I got four incorrect then. Hrrmm.
-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
Section 1: Multiple Choice (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter goan_crazy
- Start date
Revolution
Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2005
- Messages
- 100
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2005
I still don't think 17 is A...skyrockets1530 said:
Last edited:
Mz_mE
Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2005
- Messages
- 80
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
when a mediator arbitrates it just means the the mediator suggests an option for resolving the conflict.. it is not compulsory.. when the issue is taken to arbitration the arbitary person also suggests something this is a lil more compulsory but still not yet legally binding.. the court systems are the only legally binding result..
Logain
aka Will, Skis, Willskis
Arbitrate. v.
Act between parties with a view to reconciling differences.
Act between parties with a view to reconciling differences.
pig_93
Member
i need confirmation for these questions
9. i put B (cos of tax havens- my mentality) but is it c??
13. i got C but i was ready to put B. what did you's put?
17. i put B. i fear is it A now. damn.
19. i put A. right?
20. i put A cos shes asset stripping and selling and leasing back.
9. i put B (cos of tax havens- my mentality) but is it c??
13. i got C but i was ready to put B. what did you's put?
17. i put B. i fear is it A now. damn.
19. i put A. right?
20. i put A cos shes asset stripping and selling and leasing back.
Mz_mE
Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2005
- Messages
- 80
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
so then that would mean that the 'view' wouldnt be legally binding, thus 17's answer could be B?Logain said:
Logain
aka Will, Skis, Willskis
I guess (and hope 
) so. That's what I put. My teacher agreed with me.
) so. That's what I put. My teacher agreed with me.
Logain
aka Will, Skis, Willskis
True, but was the mediator the AIRC? Or just a random third party?Tommy_69 said:
Yeah but the mediator ARBITRATES meaning that it is a legally binding decision. Even though mediators aren't supposed to arbitrate....meh....it didn't even make sense but I still don't think it's B. In the exam I put D because the q said BEFORE seeking a legally binding decision so I think that's right unless the anti-discrimination tribunal's decisions are legally binding which I don't think they are. Actually is there even such thing as an anti discrimination tribunal? I thought it was the anti discrimination BOARD??? or maybe they're two seperate things. C is way off so it's either A or D. A seems really stupid though.
Mz_mE
Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2005
- Messages
- 80
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
i hope so.. but that q was a little :S they already had 2 add that missing word.. maybe they made a mistake with the whole thing..
"Under arbitration, the AIRC hears both sides of a dispute and makes a legally enforceable decision"
look at the definition "the AIRC".....this question although talks about the mediator as arbitrating. Mediator's themselves cant make a legally binding decision unless they arbitrate in a industrial tribunal such as the AIRC. Therefore in box 2 of (b)the mediator couldn't come to a decision so therefore the Mediator himself arbitrates between the two parties to come to a decision in box 3.
if the decision cannot be made it goes to through to conciliation (where the AIRC act as the mediator) if that fails it goes to AIRC to make legally enforcable ecision.
look at the definition "the AIRC".....this question although talks about the mediator as arbitrating. Mediator's themselves cant make a legally binding decision unless they arbitrate in a industrial tribunal such as the AIRC. Therefore in box 2 of (b)the mediator couldn't come to a decision so therefore the Mediator himself arbitrates between the two parties to come to a decision in box 3.
if the decision cannot be made it goes to through to conciliation (where the AIRC act as the mediator) if that fails it goes to AIRC to make legally enforcable ecision.
Logain
aka Will, Skis, Willskis
13 C
14 C (possibly incorrect.)
19 B (incorrect. Failed to notice the part referring to the subsidiary's solvency rather than the parent company's. Dammit.)
20 B
14 C (possibly incorrect.)
19 B (incorrect. Failed to notice the part referring to the subsidiary's solvency rather than the parent company's. Dammit.)
20 B
dragon fan
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2005
- Messages
- 14
What were the answers to the financial calculations in the multiple choice.
I left my paper in there but i think i got 1:4 for one question and 12.5% for the next question
I left my paper in there but i think i got 1:4 for one question and 12.5% for the next question
kafryn_rookie
In Transition
That is correct. Because it was the COST OF GOODS SOLD was $150 000 from memory... though it was a little confusing the way it was set out to conclude so i just added Expenses and Net Profit together.dragon fan said:
for 17 i personally think it is (a)... if anyone has the leading edge book that answer is word for word the 'typical grievance procedure' that is illustrated in the book. That was the only reason i put (a) over (b) because it was ultimately a toss up between the two.. only time will tell, i have had so many different opinions on the question.
also i think that 19 is (d) because the info mentioned that the audited accounts revealed that the business equipment was under valued suggesting the business used an inappropriate cut off period possibly for taxing purposes. The corporate raiding is also obvious. However this answer was also a toss up between (b) and (d)
also i think that 19 is (d) because the info mentioned that the audited accounts revealed that the business equipment was under valued suggesting the business used an inappropriate cut off period possibly for taxing purposes. The corporate raiding is also obvious. However this answer was also a toss up between (b) and (d)
kafryn_rookie
In Transition
I'd have to disgree, because i believe the answer is in fact Bsly fly said:
The only reason that it could be interpreted as incorrect is the use of the word 'ARBITRATES'. However, arbitrates does not mean that it is a legally binding decision rather it is a form of alternative dispute resolution, which is not legal offering suggestions to help resolve the conflict.
If it had been worded has 'arbitraTOR' than it would have been incorrect. Tough one though, could go either way but i do believe that it is B