SuchSmallHands
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 1,391
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2014
French isn't really an obscure language IMOEverything scales down but extension maths and obscure languages.
French isn't really an obscure language IMOEverything scales down but extension maths and obscure languages.
He meant languages with small, abnormally strong cohorts.French isn't really an obscure language IMO
Really? My careers adviser gave us one example where in one year, 8 people did Swedish or something and since the lowest mark was 94, they scaled it DOWN. Don't they need to create a bell curve (ie they can't just have everyone at the top, but need some at the bottom and most in the middle)? Gosh, the more I try to understand this system the more confused I get.He meant languages with small, abnormally strong cohorts.
You're mixing up alignment and scaling again.Really? My careers adviser gave us one example where in one year, 8 people did Swedish or something and since the lowest mark was 94, they scaled it DOWN. Don't they need to create a bell curve (ie they can't just have everyone at the top, but need some at the bottom and most in the middle)? Gosh, the more I try to understand this system the more confused I get.
I got the same speech but with Dutch! I think he meant the languages like Classical Greek extension which seem like something no one would ever do and then they go ahead and outscale 4U maths, I just pointing out that there are other languages which aren't so obscure that are doing pretty well for themselves in terms of scaling, like French.Really? My careers adviser gave us one example where in one year, 8 people did Swedish or something and since the lowest mark was 94, they scaled it DOWN. Don't they need to create a bell curve (ie they can't just have everyone at the top, but need some at the bottom and most in the middle)? Gosh, the more I try to understand this system the more confused I get.
http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=312596Any tips for physics, I'am doing the hsc next year??
Not exactly true... This years 2 unit test was the hardest since 2003 imo and is reflected by the aligning. Last years 2 unit test was one of the easiest ones and needed a much higher raw to get a band 6. The cut off for this year looks like 75/100 while last years was 84/100.the test cannot be much easier than any other, BOS can't make tests easier than others, all are equally the same in difficulty. (most cases)
You are using last years data to get to that number (unless you used an atar calc which used the very recently produced tables bu UAC). Anyway you should keep that atar equivalent but I'm not 100% sure.Ok, but will that 97.1 atar equivalent be fixed in no matter what, i.e, my ATAR average will have included 97.1?
I think I heard 84 was last years. This years looks like it was ~75 considering I got 72/73 raw and ended up with 89what was band 6 cutoff for 2013 and 2012?