• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Substitutions in inequalities (1 Viewer)

panda15

Alligator Navigator
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
675
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
In this instance, you are substituting in the same variable. p does not equal p/1+p, so you cant use this substitution.
 

oompaman

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
85
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
But the question says that p, q and r are positive real numbers and the substitution is also positive and real... still confused

isnt it similar to this? http://snag.gy/iQIt7.jpg
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,402
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
When doing substitutions you have to make sure there is no loss of the generality of the original variable.

For example, p to p/(1+p) isn't valid because p can be any positive number but p/(1+p) is constrained between 0 and 1.

This means you can't use p/(1+p) to 'represent' p.

In the other example you gave, replacing a to a1/3 is valid because both have the same restrictions (i.e. all real numbers) and thus one can represent the other.
 
Last edited:

panda15

Alligator Navigator
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
675
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Say for example, p=5. With your substitution, LHS=5, RHS=5/6. p does not equal p/1+p, so you can't use this substitution. HSC inequalities are designed to be done without the use of substitution, so don't try it tomorrow.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
i.e. there's a past Olympiad inequalities question that can be done within 5 minutes by using a suitable substitution. They can be handy.
 

panda15

Alligator Navigator
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
675
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
No, you can totally do that actually.
Wasn't aware that you could use substitution for inequalities. But the substitution OP used was incorrect. p does not equal p/p+1. They were substituting in the same variable. If they let u=p/1+p, then the substitution would be valid.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Wasn't aware that you could use substitution for inequalities. But the substitution OP used was incorrect. p does not equal p/p+1. They were substituting in the same variable. If they let u=p/1+p, then the substitution would be valid.
You can use the same variable, it's just a transformation.
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,402
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
You can use the same variable, because they are all dummy variables but you have to make sure your substitutions don't change the range of the variable, as I outlined below:
When doing substitutions you have to make sure there is no loss of the generality of the original variable.

For example, p to p/(1+p) isn't valid because p can be any positive number but p/(1+p) is constrained between 0 and 1.

This means you can't use p/(1+p) to 'represent' p.

In the other example you gave, replacing a to a1/3 is valid because both have the same restrictions (i.e. all real numbers) and thus one can represent the other.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
The "changing of range" is not the critical issue here. This entire argument is logically misguided:

The premise is that p+q-r is non-negative. This is a statement about p,q and r. The desired conclusion is also a statement about p,q, and r.

If you were to "let" p=p+1/p (pretending for the moment that this is somehow possible...trebla has shown why this cannot be done in this particular case), etc then the premise is no longer true about the new quantities you are denoting by p,q,r. (in fact your current premise is precisely the conclusion you are aiming for, so you are proving nothing.)
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Logically, the fallacy is exactly the same as making the following argument:

If the number n is prime, then the number n+1 is prime.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top