Through textual integrity, King Lear is seen as having layers of meaning, which through various interpretations allows the text to be seen as fragments. It is only when these fragments are put together that a deeper understanding of the meaning of the text can be understood.
Hence, show that King Lear has different levels of meaning by comparing and contrasting two different readings, argue that interpreting the text through a subjective single mind frame i.e. a reading, does not offer a coherent meaning of the text. thus, textual integrity will be acheived when such readings are viewed together. remember to mak reference to the theory of critical readings.