currysauce
Actuary in the making
good exam, cept for qu 5a, b i and last qu on 7
rest was sweet
rest was sweet
meee tooo >< so dissapointed... its just one of those things, that i skim over when im studying.. and this time it caught me off guard.. so embarassing.. lol'...ar3nbe said:( i couldnt even remember how to do 1a, grr).
i couldnt get binomial out either, i think i got the T, but im not sure, as i didnt get an "exact" value.. and i couldnt prove n = k +1 either, such a bummer.. i can do all of the induction q's in our textbook and previous years, but this years i couldnt do.. im also hoping for an 80%yook said:hmm the binomial/series thing [4 marks] in question seven i couldnt get out...
question seven.. couldnt get "T" (how long after the probjectile at angle B after angle A]
question six.. couldnt get "prove for n = k+ 1" FUCKERS!!!! [prob got 2/4 for that]
hoping for 80%.. maybe.. not..
Thank God we haven't done binomials...we got a replacement questionfantasy27 said:i couldnt get binomial out either, i think i got the T, but im not sure, as i didnt get an "exact" value.. and i couldnt prove n = k +1 either, such a bummer.. i can do all of the induction q's in our textbook and previous years, but this years i couldnt do.. im also hoping for an 80%
the nswer to 1a i think is 2/5laurel18 said:don't think i did too well...yeah for that induction question...I had a problem with getting rid of the dots in between...Like i got until the assume n=k bit but after that I was totally muddled...
1a i was stumped as well...
yeapss... so did I.. thats wah our teacher told us to do.. prove it true for n=1, then assume true for n=k.. then try n=k+1.. if can't do.. still do the "conclusion"physician said:as for the M.I. qurestion..hahaha.. i couldn't prove it so i concluded with
therefore by MI blah blah blah ........ lol
They won't give you marks for that though I wish they didphysician said:the nswer to 1a i think is 2/5
we havn't even done that yet.... so my teacher is taking it out....
as for the M.I. qurestion..hahaha.. i couldn't prove it so i concluded with
therefore by MI blah blah blah ........ lol