Part of what a makes just is that it "treats all people equally". In Australia, the same laws apply to everybody, and this is formal equality. This does not mean, however, that an equal outcome is achieved for everyone. For example, a rich person that gets a $200 fine for speeding will not be affected nearly as drastically as an unemployed person. The notion of achieving an equal result rather than people merely having the opportunity to achieve the same legal outcome is substantial equality.Azreil said:Purpose of the punishment: May be rehabilitation, incapacitation, deterrence etc.
Aggravating factors: Seen as objective factors, may include the use of a weapon or violence, the victim being a child/elderly, etc. These will increase the severity of the sentence.
Mitigating factors: Are subjective and are put forward by the defense. These may include a history of abuse, a mental or physical illness, etc. These will decrease the severity of the sentence.
Judicial discretion: may be used, but only within the bounds of the maximum and minimum sentences outlined in the statute law which binds the judge.
Distinguish formal and substantial equality.
Same to you. I hope its a good paper(fingers crossed) i badly want the long reponses to be on morality, ethics and comittment to the law...Azreil said:Best of luck everyone. ;]