Hey lilkiwi,
Yeah, don't worry at all about this stuff! DMO is something I'm sure you'll latch onto real quick, and, noticing you're all the way back in year 11, the pressure should be that much milder
Relax and enjoy it. It's actually heaps fluid and gets covered again in Year 12 so you don't need to fuss too much straight up!
lilkiwicutie89 said:
i cant find much information about the RBA in determining the cash rates ( market operations )
Yeah, no worries there. I'll just punch in a few page references for you.
- Pg. 192-3 - "The Market Economy" (Tim Dixon/ John O'Mahony)
- Pg. 262-4 - "Australia in the Global Economy" (Similarly)
- Pg. 181-2 - "Year 11 Economics" (Tim Riley)
Note that the second one here's a reference to a Year 12 text, one which you may or may not have on hand. You may want to hold off on this one simply due to its being a resource you shouldn't be expected to draw upon, since it lies beyond the scope of the Preliminary course (technically, not content-wise), but also because, although providing a solid account on this particular policy instrument, it is vexatiously iterative overkill. You should find you'll be able to get more than enough out of the other two Preliminary texts I've mentioned.
Deus said:
The central bank (Rba in AUstralia) carries out monetary policy on behalf of the government
lilkiwi, it's important to note that although the RBA conducts its operations on the government's behalf, it is, in its own right, an independent authority managed by a non-partisan board of directors. This status helps to protect RBA decision-making from distortion by political pressures. By the same token, however, the RBA can be classified a Commonwealth institution insofar as no economic actors from the private sector hold direct stake in it (the private sector rarely transacts directly with the RBA) and also because it is wholly accountable to parliament and any jurisdiction thereof.
Deus said:
Now every financial institutaion is required to hold an Exchange settlement account (ES) with the RBA
This is not true. Only banks have ES accounts. Though the RBA does not deny other financial institutions attention provided they are members of the Reserve Bank Information and Transfer System, it is typically only banks whose transactions are settled through ESAs. Think of non-bank financial intermediaries. In the case of these organisations, settlement involves mere shuffling of funds between borrowers and lenders of cash, independent of RBA intervention. See the following page:
http://www.rba.gov.au/DomesticMarketOperations/Publications/implementation_of_monetary_policy.html
Deus said:
A sale of securities by the RBA would mean a reduction of funds in ESAs which would force dealers to borrow on the short-term money market to meet their obligations
This is not necessarily true, and, besides, is far from the rationale of DMO. The repurchase agreements made by the RBA serve, principally, to exert influence over the overnight cash rate in the short run money market. The chief role this plays is to reflect the changes in liquidity that have taken place, in the ESAs, due to the involvement of the RBA in this market, and, by no means, would force any participating institutions into debt, as you have said. You have to realise that monetary policy is a response to, and not a cause of the relative differentials between holdings of funds in different institutions. A "dealer" could incur a deficiency of funds for any number of reasons, including through purchase of currency notes from the RBA or any other form of transaction shifting supply of funds in the market for settlement accounts. It need not be a product of the sale of CGS.
Deus said:
As they are short of funds they increase their rates to entice more funds
Ah, no dude. The shortage of funds occurs in the market for settlement accounts, not in the banks themselves, and "they" don't raise their rates, the market determines a mutual "cash rate" that reflects the changes in the supply of funds that have taken place as a result of RBA activity. The rate you mention can simply be thought of as a "price" for the borrowing of these funds. There is less money, therefore it will cost more to borrow it (Think of it as the same number of market participants chasing less funds, and it will follow logically). The implementation of DMO affects the entirety of the financial sector, to the extent that it interacts with the RBA, and will not render any institution less advantaged than another.
Deus said:
Im not sure you understood that ramble
Ya, I'm sure it'll be cool, considering the sheer artistry with which you've cut and pasted from every resource on the topic I can think of! In future, it'd be safer for you not to extrapolate beyond what you copy in, particularly when it has quite clearly been vacuously regurgitated and has no originality or personal thought processes underpinning it. Change that around, man! You'll be surprised how much richer the experience will get for you
lilkiwicutie89 said:
im still not sure about it .. yeahh we have to give a powepoint presentation
Yeah, no probs! Being a ppt presentation, just remember to get it as striking and colourful as you can. You want to be able to arrest your asudience's attention as well as cover all the content you need to. I'd encourage you to whack in a flow chart outlining the process of monetary policy (both contractionary and expansionary - in other words, for the selling, or tightening, and buying, or loosening, of monetary policy). Also, you might want to make a pass at a few demand/supply curves and get a bit of a before and after DMO thing happening
Yeah, and also, just try and keep it as simple as posssible. Don't use long, drawn out paragraphs. Write your large, clear bullet points so your audience can see and then dive into greater depth with your actual speech (you give a speech with ppt too, right?). And, yeah, other than that, best of luck