thorrnydevil
Ancient Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2004
- Messages
- 1,521
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
You do realise most of your policy's are extremely capitalist?
Either he is trolling or he doesn't know what communism is.thorrnydevil said:You do realise most of your policy's are extremely capitalist?
Actually, that's the irony. I do know what Communism is.Adrian. said:
Capitalism relies on cost effective solutions and maintaining property rights. The tarpaulin does neither.biggles04 said:Actually, that's the irony. I do know what Communism is.
We are am extremely Capitalist party, but do you think people will vote for a capitalist party? No, so we're lying to get ourselves in power, disguising ourselves as communists to win the hearts of the people.
Hey, if John Howard can do it, why can't we?
Thank you for your lecture on capitalism, you are rather correct although it also involves the privatisation of everything.withoutaface said:Capitalism relies on cost effective solutions and maintaining property rights. The tarpaulin does neither.
mmhmmm. I'll be back ;]playboy2njoy said:No matter, the leader is banned. *raises hand in salute*
I believe some areas of the tarpaulin can be removed for specific areas, such as national parks. Contrary to wasting water, it would catch all the water, resulting in a water yield of near 100%, and, with expert engineering, the tarpaulin will be capable of funneling all the water into depleted dams, farms or onto any bushfires. The tarp wouldn't be low enough so as to prevent aircraft from landing, I imagine it would be raised at least ten kilometres into the air allowing planes to fly in underneath it and commence the landing procedure.nicksta_40 said:a massive tarpoulin over ALL of AUS? u kiddn?!?! How would rain reach the land? Planes land? Sunlight reach the flora to generate growth? theres just a few off the top of my head, theres 1000's more reasons y thats a stupid idea