Quite possibly, what have you been doing then?madd-eh? said:Am I the only person in the world who hasn't done motors and generators?
Quite possibly, what have you been doing then?madd-eh? said:Am I the only person in the world who hasn't done motors and generators?
everything but that.karnage said:Quite possibly, what have you been doing then?
it was on environment? not societyDaniel-08 said:lol wat did u guys write 4 the westinghouse question?
i wrote about how AC generators make life easier and require less unskilled labour.
is that right?
I did that, plus a 5th one where i blamed edison and said that westinghouse beat edison who's DC power would've had a much bigger impact and in a way, westinghouse prevented this and so we still actully have an environment. However, I explained it in better, exam-like words and stuffdolbinau said:I wrote mainly about the environment however I did put a little about society as ini the quote he said he wanted to help his fellow man or something, which I wanted to acknowledge. Here was my format:
1. Positive Environmental effects (electricity over cutting down/burning trees)
2. Negative Environmental effects
3. "Despite" the effects, impact on society, development of 'clean' AC.
4. Relate back to quote that he'd be happy
Yes, probably a good idea considering the syllabus point includes him as well .Cob-was-here said:I did that, plus a 5th one where i blamed edison and said that westinghouse beat edison who's DC power would've had a much bigger impact and in a way, westinghouse prevented this and so we still actully have an environment. However, I explained it in better, exam-like words and stuff
you were suppose to write the impacts it had on the environment rather than society, i thinkDaniel-08 said:lol wat did u guys write 4 the westinghouse question?
i wrote about how AC generators make life easier and require less unskilled labour.
is that right?
The focus was the impact on the environment...but you could always include society so long as it relates to the quote...which I believe the quote was originally intended to mean.mickael said:you were suppose to write the impacts it had on the environment rather than society, i think
It didn't have polarisation, it has superposition. Yeah, I put quantisation too because that was einstein.Daniel-08 said:I believe the question aked which property of radio waves Hertz did not use in his experiments. the options were:
diffraction, quantisation, refraction, and polarisation.
I put quantisation but im not sure
Thats what i did,dolbinau said:Surprisingly good.
The output should be equal, but it wasn't hence you had to find the powerloss.
P=IV
for primary P=12*0.05=0.6
For secondary P=6*(0.0002)=0.0012
There for, there was 0.5988 Watts of power loss.
At least, this is what I did. I'm not sure if I was right.
What was the superconductor question??shais said:Can someone answer the superconductor Question ???