well its certainly better than having to pay full fees...yrtherenonames said:There's life after the HSC but they didn't want to make a huge difference to the name, lest we confuse it for something good. It's called HECS
I thought letting ur parents pay for uni would be better...hahaAbtari said:well its certainly better than having to pay full fees...
That would undoubtedly require 99+ in Advanced English thenSlide Rule said:Advanced English? The messed up thing is that I'll do better in that then I will in 4u.
HSC is the biggest wank I've been througth in my life. Although School Certificate Geography comes close.
There's no way to tell what 100/120 would align to, but my guess is ~95-96 given that something in the vicinity of 75/120 would probably align to a Band E4. Either way if you can get 100/120, you're doing very well .lum said:hmm, were the 1990/1991 hscs easier than the recent ones? caz i got pretty good in those compared to other ones i've done.
also, what would a 100/120 raw score give for the hsc?
What were your marks for these exams 00-04 respectively for 4unit??~ ReNcH ~ said:There's no way to tell what 100/120 would align to, but my guess is ~95-96 given that something in the vicinity of 75/120 would probably align to a Band E4. Either way if you can get 100/120, you're doing very well .
I've done papers from 2000-2004, and based on my marks the most difficult was 2000 and then 2003, followed by 2004, 2001 and 2002. Nevertheless, my marks aren't really anything to go by - I'm not too sure about pre-2000 papers though.
haha ok, yeah true. Im guessing quite a few of us here did a bit of work in the early days. But good times anyway. yr12 was sooo much better though!Slide Rule said:LaCe, nobody mentioned studying for the SC. Calm down.
And equally, I'm sure you'll look back at the HSC and think "wtf did I study for that?"
84/97/102/85/91 - quite inconsistent really, but I'd be hoping for at least 95/120 in the 2005 exam which should (fingers crossed) align to around 95/100. I was a bit disappointed with my result in 2004 and somewhat so in 2000, but to be entirely honest 2003 just plain drop-kicked meLaCe said:What were your marks for these exams 00-04 respectively for 4unit??
I remember one guy posting on here who said that his friend got no more than 85/120 and ended up with 93. He may not be a credible source, but hopefully he's right. If he is right, then I think something in the vicinity of 73/120 would align to 90antwan2bu said:yeh im getting like 75-85 raw marks, so thats like 90ish aligned (guessing of course)? except for 1999, which must be the easiest hsc ever devised.
I've done the exact same thing and I'd have to agree with those marks - 2000 was bitchy... as for the papers from 95-99 they are relatively ezy...~ ReNcH ~ said:There's no way to tell what 100/120 would align to, but my guess is ~95-96 given that something in the vicinity of 75/120 would probably align to a Band E4. Either way if you can get 100/120, you're doing very well .
I've done papers from 2000-2004, and based on my marks the most difficult was 2000 and then 2003, followed by 2004, 2001 and 2002. Nevertheless, my marks aren't really anything to go by - I'm not too sure about pre-2000 papers though.