wendus
krawr.
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2007
- Messages
- 653
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2008
no, the UN should put him in gaol for life. he deserves the long-term suffering!Chris. said:the UN should plan to assasinate Mugabe
no, the UN should put him in gaol for life. he deserves the long-term suffering!Chris. said:the UN should plan to assasinate Mugabe
Because it's neither our business nor our responsibility?lasnAy said:i was actually really devastated when i heard this on the enws yesterday...... why can't Australia and other nations hurry up and step in?!
I have to disagree.. Isn't there a UN Declaration that its out job to ensure that people are not suffering? That we are to intervene if people are suffering in other countries.^CoSMic DoRiS^^ said:Because it's neither our business nor our responsibility?
We don't have a moral obligation to 'step in' and 'fix' the fuck ups of other countries, you know. I'm a bit disappointed that Tsvangirai has withdrawn but tbh it's not like we couldn't have seen it coming.
Oh I know what you're saying. I don't think it's necessarily the right thing to do to just leave them to it...but I do take issue with the idea that we always have to intervene when another country can't handle it's own shit. The suffering of the people in Zimbabwe is not something I'm comfortable with, don't get me wrong. But direct intervention (e.g. in the form of military action, etc) does not sit well with me either.kokodamonkey said:I have to disagree.. Isn't there a UN Declaration that its out job to ensure that people are not suffering? That we are to intervene if people are suffering in other countries.
How are we supposed to go on from here? They are going to go ahead with their sham election, in which Mugabe will obviously win, and then thats that end of story we are all supposed to forget about the suffering of the people? I know i cant..
well the other ways haven't worked.. Surely military action is the last thing "on the list" that we are left to do?^CoSMic DoRiS^^ said:Oh I know what you're saying. I don't think it's necessarily the right thing to do to just leave them to it...but I do take issue with the idea that we always have to intervene when another country can't handle it's own shit. The suffering of the people in Zimbabwe is not something I'm comfortable with, don't get me wrong. But direct intervention (e.g. in the form of military action, etc) does not sit well with me either.
I very much doubt that a military intervention in Zimbabwe would end well for anyone. I'm aware that no diplomatic action thus far has done much to help the situation but I can't see military operations making anything better either. I also tend to believe that nations are entitled to their independence in dealing with their own problems - I know many people would disagree with me, but to me the idea of sending in troops to "fix" Zimbabwe reeks of condescension. Like "hey, you blackies are too screwed up to save yourselves, let kind old father whitey fix it for you like good children". Melodrama there maybe, but you know what I'm saying.kokodamonkey said:well the other ways haven't worked.. Surely military action is the last thing "on the list" that we are left to do?
My main issue that i grapple with is where do we draw the line... On what nations we need to "intervene " in. Zimbabwe? Burma? North Korea? New Zealand?