withoutaface said:
Why must you dismiss all who get nothing out of their compulsory subscription as whingers?
because to suggest that you 'get nothing' is indicative of a narrow perspective on things
i think if you view education like a product you get short sighted
i'm not suggesting that people are whingers, rather that there is more at stake than whether you think you've saved a lot of pennies from union fees.
for instance, maybe people could expand their political viewpoint to accomodate others, as well as the universities themselves as quality institutions.
taking this issue on as a market exercise loses sight of many the many valuable assets student unionism offers which aren't easily quantified. the universal agency provided by collective strength cannot be underestimated, not to mention the cultural infrastructure it gives to the university.
i know this is all ideological, but i just get frustrated with this idea that a political agenda is worthwhile as long as it serves shortterm economic gains. what's to be said of the universities of our country in the long term if it degrees become mere products?
take for an example a degree from Sydney University which carries with it historic connotations, as well as notions of 'prestige'. universities are cultural institutions. Contributing to the cultural heritage of universities in the form of union fees seems only fair.