And that guy above, please don't patronise me with ideas about prehistoric history and archaeology, it's what I study.
Don't quit your day job, Booyah!
And rather not argue with people who propose the colonialist and imperialist definitions of nation, which only work in favour of the White colonialist nations and gives the excuse to not accept colonial past as something exploitative, i will look at the Aboriginal naiton today.
Do Aboriginal people today have a common lanuage? Yes this is called Aboriginal English.
Do Aboriginal people today share a common economic position and living standard? Yes they are deprived of the wealth, health and employment standards of the White colonialist nation.
Do Aboriginal people have a historical connection to a area of land? Yes, Aboriginal people are the historical descendants of the original inhabitants of Australia, making up various nations in the continent and it's islands
Aboriginal people of today make up a nation, and thus a nation within a nation. Just like the Black nation in the US, the Kurdistan nation in Iraq, Turky and Syria or the Palestinian nation which is occupied by another false nation Israel.
do you honestly think that muslim people introduced the idea of gangs and violence to australia? you think this 'defending' of Australia through violence was more righteous than the violence created by the 'muslims'?
This is what a few people are proposing and i believe it to be correct and not only do leftistist believe this, a few right wing people recgonise the similarities expressed between the chauvinism of young Arabs in Australia and young Anglos in Australia. This culture is part of the dominant male culture in Australia.
Note: I left out the not in "And rather not argue", i have edited this now